Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Stephen Harper takes aim at terror, opposition gets dinged

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 31 Januari 2015 | 21.16

The rollout of the federal government's new terror legislation went fine. The prime minister's speech was clear and well staged. A friendly crowd applauded on cue. His pose was the stern statesman, on guard for thee.

But, it wasn't all statesman, all the time. It's still an election year and Stephen Harper did not forget to stick a knife in the opposition. If that required a glaring inaccuracy — well, did I mention it's an election year?

Harper turned to the flap over the fighting in northern Iraq and the role of Canada's troops.

"There's been some criticism of them, as you know," he said.

Um, no, we didn't know. In fact, there has been no criticism of our troops. Quite the reverse.

The criticism, of course, was aimed at the government, not the troops. The opposition complains that Harper promised Canadian soldiers would not "accompany" Iraqi forces to the front. Harper did say that — but we now know otherwise. In fact, our guys spend 20 per cent of their time with Iraqi troops at the front and have been shot at three times.

So, the opposition wants Harper to eat his words and Harper is fending off the attacks by pretending they're attacks on our brave troops.

'Accompanying' or not?

It hasn't always worked well. In the House of Commons, Defence Minister Rob Nicholson made sport of the opposition by observing that he didn't see how we could train Iraqi soldiers without accompanying them. The Conservatives chuckled at their naive rivals across the aisle. What chumps, thinking we'd teach without accompanying!

It wasn't so funny when it dawned on them that Harper was the first to say, no, we'll definitely be teaching but not accompanying. Oops.

Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Tom Lawson had a more candid strategy: he just fessed up. Lawson agreed that, yes, he originally said our guys would not go to the front — but, hey, things evolved, so then they did.

And everybody shrugged. In war, stuff happens. Even candour, sometimes!

But the government's strategy has been more problematic: trying to make an indictment of the government's honesty sound like an indictment of our troops — nay, of our troops under fire!

"If fired upon, they'll fire back!" the prime minister declared, as though anyone had urged them not to.

Still, Canadians are not marching with pitchforks upon the prime minister's office to protest what seems to be an acceptable degree of mission creep. And Harper has no apology. Nor was it the only bullet he aimed at terrorists that just happened to ding the opposition.

Asked Friday about a potential sacrifice of civil liberties on the altar of security, Harper was ready.

Harper takes questions on anti-terror bill15:48

"This is really what we get from our opposition," he alleged. "That every time we talk about security, they suggest that somehow, our freedoms are threatened ... I think Canadians understand that, more often than not, their freedom and security go hand in hand ... We do not buy the argument that every time you protect Canadians you somehow take away their liberties."

Once again, nobody's actually making that argument. In fact, Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair said the opposite, agreeing that security and liberty can coexist just fine.

"We are capable of doing both at the same time," said Mulcair. "We'll make sure that this bill ensures that, and we'll ask the appropriate questions."

Mulcair says Canada can protect safety and rights1:06

So the prime minister's in combat with a straw man, the only one saying security means the end of freedom.

Rather, the opposition seems wary of being painted as "soft on terror." They have enough problems already after voting against a mission, which, pollsters say, most Canadians support. Conservatives hope voters will judge that vote a bigger sin than mere rhetorical baloney.

More powers, what about people?

To counter that, the opposition will paint the government as phoney tough guys whose rhetoric is not matched by funding for the security agencies. What if you introduced a shiny, new terror bill and no-one showed up to enforce it?

Ray Boisvert, the former assistant director of CSIS, says that's exactly what's happening.

"I know, from being a former insider, [CSIS is] maxed out," said Boisvert.

"They are so tapped out and they have stolen so much from Peter to pay Paul. In other words, they have closed down so many other investigations that are still rather important ... Get your chequebook out folks, because I think that's just a reality."

With a war, an election and a budget in the balance, we'll hear more of this. Who's really tough on terror? They're writing the attack ads now.

Warning: inaccuracies may occur.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Premiers, federal finance minister spar over infrastructure funding

Canada's premiers emerged from a meeting in Ottawa united in their call for further strategic investments in infrastructure and the need to focus on the health-care of seniors as the country heads toward a federal election later this year.

Ontario's Kathleen Wynne, who's advocated a multi-billion-dollar partnership between the federal government and the provinces on infrastructure, fired back at Finance Minister Joe Oliver who earlier in the day expressed dismay that the premiers were looking for further investments in infrastructure as plummeting oil prices threaten Ottawa's bottom line.

"The opposition and some premiers appear oblivious to the consequences of the current global instability and the dramatic decline in the price of oil," Oliver said in a written statement on Friday.

"This is precisely the wrong time to launch a massive deficit program that would undermine investor confidence, erode our credit standing, weaken our ability to withstand further international shocks, add to our debt burden, reduce our ability to support social programs and burden our children with our expenditures," Oliver said.

Wynne called Oliver's response unfortunate and short-sighted, at the end of the Council of the Federation's winter meeting.

Time for infrastructure now, premiers say

"I believe the response that Mr. Oliver gave so quickly to our discussions really demonstrates, in my opinion, that the oblivion is not on the part of the premiers.

"The oblivion is actually on the part of the federal government that is apparently not listening to all of the voices at this table who have said that... investment in infrastructure is important on a number of fronts," Wynne said.

Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard said the timing of Oliver's missive could not have been worse.

The premiers received an economic briefing today from Kevin Lynch, vice chair of the BMO Financial Group, and chief among his recommendations, Couillard said, was the need for "accelerated investments in infrastructure."

Couillard said infrastructure spending was "logical," "reasonable" and would create jobs across the country.

The meeting's host, P.E.I. Premier Robert Ghiz, said the country is facing an infrastructure "deficit."

Canada spends just 3.5 per cent of its GDP on infrastructure, he noted, while other countries spend more. The premiers agreed during the meeting that all of their jurisdictions need new or updated bridges, roads and public buildings, Ghiz said.

There was a broad consensus around the table on seniors' health care, according to those on the sidelines of the meeting.

David Granovsky, head of government relations for the Canadian Nurses Association, said his organization had urged Ghiz to include a national seniors' health care strategy on the agenda and called it a significant development that the premiers gave the issue such close attention.

Ghiz also said the premiers also agreed to work with local law enforcement agencies in their jurisdictions to ensure Canadians are safe from terrorism.

Energy East pipeline

Ghiz said he and his counterparts made great progress on the so-called Canadian Energy Strategy, an initiative involving all 13 premiers, focused on climate change and clean energy.

The provinces discussed TransCanada's proposed Energy East pipeline, Ghiz said. That $12 billion project would carry oil from the western provinces to the Bay of Fundy.

Last year, Wynne and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard — who have become close allies on climate, in particular — laid out a list of requirements that would determine whether they'd throw their support behind Energy East.

Couillard was to update his counterparts about the so-called Canadian Energy Strategy today. It's an initiative involving all 13 provinces and territories focused on climate change and clean energy.

The premiers — all but Alberta's Jim Prentice and Saskatchewan's Brad Wall — met in a hotel just a few blocks from Prime Minister Stephen Harper's office.

Wynne invited the prime minister to the meeting, but he declined to attend. Harper has not met with the premiers as a group for several years.

Ghiz ribbed Harper for meeting with Wynne on the sidelines of a hockey tournament earlier this month, the first time the two had met in a year.

"If I had planned it a little bit better, maybe I would have planned this meeting around the World Junior Hockey championships and he would have been here, but, you know, hindsight is 20-20," he said.

For all the chuckles, however, there was evidence of genuine antagonism between provincial and federal officials as some griped off the record about the Conservatives' terror bill announcement. Several suggested the Tories deliberately announced the bill on Friday to steal thunder from their meeting.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Anti-terrorism powers: What's in today's legislation?

Canada's government today introduced its new anti-terror legislation, a sweeping range of measures that would allow suspects to be detained based on less evidence and let CSIS actively interfere with suspects' travel plans and finances.

The new bill, C-51, is only 62 pages long but contains a variety of increased powers for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). 

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and other cabinet ministers have repeatedly tied the bill to the fallout of the attacks on two soldiers in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Que., and in Ottawa at the National War Memorial and on Parliament Hill in October.

Despite the strength of the proposed new powers, however, officials at a briefing weren't able to say which measures would have prevented the attacks. Harper would only say the police would have had "more and better" tools had they had these measures.

Here's a look at key elements of the bill:

1. Lower the threshold for arrest

The new measures would let law enforcement agencies arrest somebody if they think a terrorist act "may be carried out," instead of the current standard of "will be carried out." It would also increase the period of preventive detention from three days to seven.

Another measure would provide for a terrorism peace bond that would detain someone if the police believe that person "may commit" a terrorism offence. The current provision allows for a peace bond on someone the police think "will commit" a terrorism offence.

A peace bond under the new measures would require the person to surrender his or her passport and would apply for five years if that person had been previously convicted of a terrorism offence.

The bill also includes a requirement for judges to consider imposing conditions on the person, including passport surrender, electronic monitoring or a ban on leaving the jurisdiction.

2. Criminalize promoting terrorism

Right now, it's illegal to counsel or actively encourage someone to commit a specific terrorism offence. Bill C-51 would broaden that to ban the promotion of terrorism or intentional advocacy of it. The bill threatens a maximum sentence of five years in prison. 

Officials were careful to note that the bill doesn't criminalize the glorification of terrorism, noting the difficulty in balancing freedom of speech with the desire to keep people from encouraging terrorist activity.  ​

3. Allow CSIS to 'counter-message' or 'disrupt' activities

The bill would also give CSIS the ability to disrupt suspected terror activity, including radical websites and Twitter accounts, as well as "counter-message." The power applies inside and outside of Canada.

That means security officials could go online to challenge the online communications sent to those suspected of becoming radicalized. It also includes interfering with travel plans and financial transactions or intercepting goods, according to background documents.

Steven Blaney 20150121

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney is responsible for CSIS and the RCMP. (Ryan Remiorz/Canadian Press)

If there were a threat to the subject's legal rights, a court order would be needed, if it involves a Canadian or permanent resident. For non-Canadians outside the country, officials said it would depend on a legal analysis of the situation.

One example of disruption would be to interrupt a phone call between subjects. It could also mean CSIS could involve a subject's family and friends in deterring that person from participating in terrorism and inform the RCMP of its suspicions. However, there is no definition of "to disrupt" in the legislation, leaving it open to interpretation.

The bill also carries a requirement for the Security Intelligence Review Committee, or SIRC, which has oversight of CSIS, to report every year on disruption activities.

4. Remove terrorist material from the internet

The "seizure of terrorist propaganda" measure would let officials apply to a court to order the seizure, or force a website to remove, "any materials that promote or encourage acts of terrorism against Canadians in general, or the commission of a specific attack against Canadians," according to background material provided to journalists.

This would expand a measure that currently allows a court to order the removal of child pornography and hate propaganda. However, the information provided at the background briefing did not say specifically which officials would be able to apply for the order — whether it would be CSIS, police or other officials.

The consent of the attorney general would be necessary for the court to consider the request.

5. Allow for court proceedings to be sealed

Currently, Division 9 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act allows the government to ask the court to protect classified information in immigration proceedings to protect investigation techniques and witnesses. But that application comes at the end of a proceeding. The measure would allow the government to ask for proceedings to be sealed at any point in the process.

6. Expand the no-fly list

The bill would allow the government to add to the no-fly list anyone it believes might be travelling to engage in terrorism, and it would define the appeal process.

CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

NDP, Liberals post best fundraising results in 10 years

But the Conservatives still fundraised more than either of the opposition parties

The Canadian Press Posted: Jan 30, 2015 7:09 PM ET Last Updated: Jan 30, 2015 7:09 PM ET

Both the New Democrats and the federal Liberals posted their best fundraising results in a decade last year — significantly eroding the Conservatives' cash advantage just as an election is looming.

Still, the governing party raised $20.1 million last year, its third-best result in 10 years and considerably more than either of the opposition parties.

The NDP raked in $9.5 million and the Liberals $15.8 million, according to quarterly financial reports filed with Elections Canada.

The Conservatives have ruled the federal fundraising roost since 2004, when individual donations were capped at $5,000 a year and union and corporate donations were severely restricted.

The Tories tightened the screws further in 2007, capping individual donations at $1,000 (indexed to inflation) and banning corporate and union donations outright.

The Conservatives, least reliant on wealthy individuals, corporations and unions, were able for years to routinely pull in more donations than the two opposition parties combined.

Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Submission Policy

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and published according to our submission guidelines.

Stay Connected with CBC News

Advertisment

Latest Politics News Headlines

The House

  • New anti-terrorism bill Jan. 31, 2015 2:01 PM This week on The House, Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney outlines the contents of the government's new anti-terrorism bill. Then opposition critics Paul Dewar and Wayne Easter voice their concerns.

Advertisment


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Sarah Palin's scorched-earth plan for the GOP

Sarah Palin, who now says she's definitely interested in "serving" as president next year, made a speech last weekend at a gathering of Republican White House aspirants in Iowa.

It was somewhat coarser, and certainly more bitter, than her usual bundle of platitudes and jingoism.

At one point she shouted "Screw the left in Hollywood!" And she complained about how even some Republicans are buying into "this unhealthy new obsession … about this subjective income gap that we're supposed to be so obsessed about right now."

She came close to suggesting conservative Republicans rip up their cards and register as independents in order to punish the party leadership, then seemed to abandon the idea.

She referred to the "800-pound elephant in the room of the White House that the radical left won't even name."

That would actually be a rather tiny elephant, but she was happy to name it anyway: "Any Muslim who would choose evil." And then she made a declaration so incoherent it made international news.

"Everyday-Americans are getting taken for a ride … and GOP leaders, by the way: the 'Man' can only ride ya when your back is bent, so strengthen it! Then the Man can't ride ya and Americans won't be taken for a ride."

There was also a lot about the viciousness and stupidity of political reporters.

Naturally, political reporters responded.

So over

Under the headline: "Sarah Palin slips into self-parody," Charles W. Cooke called it "the foreordained culmination of a slow and unseemly descent into farce," suggesting she stay out of the race for the good of her party.

Charles W. Cooke writes for National Review, one of this country's premier conservative publications.

Under another withering headline, "GOP faces its Sarah Palin problem," Byron York interviewed several dismayed audience members: "It was all quite petty," he concluded.

"She proceeded to blow through her time limit with a free-association ramble on Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the energy industry, her daughter, Bristol, Margaret Thatcher … and much more. It would be hard to say (Palin) had a theme."

Byron York is one of Washington's more prominent conservative authors. And a Fox News regular.

Craig Robinson, of the Iowa Republican Blog, said Palin made Donald Trump look serious.

Clearly, Sarah Palin and perhaps a handful of vigilante militia members are the only people left who take Sarah Palin seriously. There is now serious talk of excluding her from future Republican nomination events.

But she did at one point in that speech issue an interesting challenge to the Republican hierarchy.

Let us, she said, nominate a presidential candidate who is a clear, unambiguous, social, fiscal and religious conservative, someone with "bold conservative colours, not establishment, pale pastels."

Republican bingo

Now, Palin's version of a real conservative is becoming pretty extreme. She's started referring to the liberal-bashing Fox News Channel as "a quasi, or assumed conservative outlet."

But her basic point is one that some serious Republican players have made, too.

People like Jim DeMint, head of the Heritage Foundation, and Senator Ted Cruz, the Tea Party hero from Texas, and Kentucky's Senator Rand Paul, another Tea Party hero, have all suggested it's long past time to nominate an uncompromising conservative.

GOP 2016 Romney Donors

A favourite of Republican donors, former presidential candidate Mitt Romney was considering another bid, until he pulled the plug on Friday. (Associated Press)

The party's problem, DeMint and his colleagues on the Republican right have suggested, is not that Americans aren't interested in conservative solutions, it's that conservatives haven't communicated their solutions with sufficient clarity.

If someone could just do that, bingo. The mission of building a truly conservative America could begin.

Testing that theory would of course be every reporter's idea of an epic story.

Consider, say, Hillary Clinton versus a red-meat conservative who wants to shut down the Federal Reserve, the Environmental Protection Agency, the federal Education Department and maybe even the Internal Revenue Service, slash taxes, put God back in the public square, privatize social security, kill Obamacare, bomb the hell out of evil regimes abroad, and stop welfare Tuesday.

I'm all for it. A contest like that, I mean.

Most Republicans, though, aren't.

The two unofficial leaders of the 2016 Republican field — which already contains more than two dozen contenders with some sort of profile or credentials — didn't bother attending the Iowa "freedom summit."

Former Florida governor Jeb Bush and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, both among the most pale of Republican pastels, were presumably too busy competing elsewhere for the support of big-time donors.

Romney, after losing the nomination in 2008 and the election in 2012, repeatedly promised he wouldn't run again.

But then he saw another 2012-style freak show shaping up, and started reading polls suggesting that what Republicans really want is a moderate, establishment candidate, and his nostrils flared at the whiff of possible victory.

A few weeks ago, he started telling donors he wanted to run. Then, on Friday, he told supporters he "believes it's time to give other leaders in the party the opportunity to become the next nominee."

Which of course doesn't mean he's not running. Anything short of the Sherman declaration nowadays means you're still in the game.

At the moment, anyway, Romney is the big dog in the polls. And number two is George W. Bush's brother Jeb, whose views on absorbing illegal immigrants (let's get on with it) are abhorrent to the party's far right, but appeal to the huge, growing and coveted Latino demographic.

Also a big contender, at least if investigations into his administration's political shenanigans don't disqualify him, is another relative moderate, the immensely likeable Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey.

Republicans 2016-Carson

Dr. Ben Carson addresses the Republican National Committee luncheon earlier this month in San Diego. The former neurosurgeon and conservative favourite is riding high in some polls as a possible presidential candidate. (Associated Press)

But there's an outlier who's somehow consistently right behind Romney and Bush: Ben Carson, an eminent retired neurosurgeon and author. He is brilliant, black, charismatic, deeply religious and easily conservative enough for Sarah Palin.

He has compared Obamacare to slavery. He has questioned the ethics of people who believe in evolution. He has compared Democrats to Nazis. He's compared same-sex marriage to pedophaelia and bestiality. He also opposes affirmative action.

A small wrinkle: he opposed the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. But that's in the past now, after all, and as Palin puts it, true conservatives have a political war on their hands.

Carson might just be their huckleberry. He seems a lot more popular than other far-right contenders, and he'd certainly settle the question of whether Americans want an unambiguous conservative.

You betcha he would. Let's do this.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Dean Del Mastro fundraiser cleared by elections commissioner

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 30 Januari 2015 | 21.16

CBC News has learned the commissioner of Canada Elections has cleared the organizers of an event that raised nearly $40,000 — and provided tax receipts — to pay some of former MP Dean Del Mastro's legal fees.

Investigator Al Mathews, who investigated the 2011 illegal robocalls in Guelph, Ont., probed the fundraiser but found nothing improper about it.

The Conservative electoral district association in Peterborough, Ont. arranged a May, 2013 event at Toronto's swanky Albany Club in support of Del Mastro. The event featured former prime minister Brian Mulroney as the headliner. Because it was billed as a riding association event, anyone who bought one of the $600-tickets was issued a tax receipt for $515. 

The money was never intended for the riding association, however, according to its president. The money went straight to Del Mastro, Alan Wilson told CBC News last fall.

"These were funds that were raised separately and essentially moved through the EDA. They were put into the EDA and moved straight back out again. So we did not provide any of our funds for Mr. Del Mastro's defence," Alan Wilson said. 

CBC News has learned Wilson was informed this week that Mathews has ended his investigation, finding that the association broke no rules. Canada has no guidelines for how federal riding associations spend their money outside of an election period.

Wilson would only say he's pleased with the determination the riding association did nothing wrong.

Political contributions are eligible for a tax credit of up to $650, depending on the amount contributed. The Del Mastro event collected $39,310 for his defence. Using a formula provided on the website of Elections Canada, CBC News calculated that was worth $23,851.13 in tax credits. 

Del Mastro, who was elected three times as a Conservative MP, stepped down from the caucus when he was charged in 2013 with breaking election spending rules. He resigned his seat in the House of Commons last fall, a few days after he was found guilty of spending too much on his 2008 campaign, donating too much to himself and faking paperwork to cover it up. Del Mastro faces a maximum penalty of three years in jail and a $6,000 fine. 

Del Mastro's official agent, Richard McCarthy, was also found guilty of overspending and covering it up. Another charge against both men was stayed.

The two men were scheduled for a sentencing hearing Tuesday in Peterborough, but the court spent the day dealing with three applications filed by Del Mastro's lawyer, Leo Adler.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stephen Harper to unveil new anti-terror bill — in Richmond Hill

Prime Minister Stephen Harper heads to Richmond Hill for the much-anticipated unveiling of his government's latest bid to boost the powers of Canada's law enforcement and intelligence agencies to monitor, track, and, as reported by CBC News last night, even preemptively disrupt the activities of suspected terrorists and terrorist sympathizers.

Although the bill itself will, of course, must be tabled in the House of Commons, which is expected to take place shortly after noon, the advisory for today's event makes it clear that, as far as the government is concerned, that's little more than a bit of parliamentary paperwork, as the two ministers to be charged with shepherding the bill through the House — Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney and Justice Minister Peter MacKay — are slated to join the prime minister at the Toronto-area event.

Back in Ottawa, MPs will spend one final day debating the pros and cons of the previous anti-terror bill, which was introduced last fall just weeks after the Oct. 22 shootings, and will expand the reach of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to conduct operations outside Canada.

Premiers meet

A few blocks away from Parliament Hill, Canada's provincial and territorial premiers — except, that is, for Alberta's Jim Prentice, who claimed to be too busy planning to the budget to join his counterparts in Ottawa, and Saskatchewan's Brad Wall, who will be attending via teleconference — will convene behind closed doors at a downtown Ottawa hotel, where they are expected to discuss a wide range of issues pertinent to their respective and collective interests, including energy, infrastructure and internal trade barriers.

Later this morning, a coalition of concerned advocacy groups, including the Council of Canadians, Ecology Ottawa and the Raging Grannies will gather outside the venue to call on the assembled premiers to address what they describe as "the elephant in the room": TransCanada's proposed Energy East pipeline, which, they aver, will "unleash pollution equivalent to adding 7 million cars on the roads."

On the opposition front, New Democrat Leader Tom Mulcair makes his way to Sudbury, where he'll team up with his Ontario counterpart, Andrea Howarth, in a show of support for provincial byelection hopeful Suzanne Shawbonquit, who will face off against former federal New Democrat turned provincial Liberal candidate Glenn Thibeault at the ballot box next week.

Before hitting the hustings, Mulcair will pay a visit to a local retirement home, chat with students at Cambrian College and drop by the local Legion to meet with veterans.

Meanwhile, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is off to Quebec, where he will deliver a lunch speech at the Chambre de commerce et d'industrie Nouvelle-Beauce.

Elsewhere on the out of town circuit:

  • Treasury Board President Tony Clement takes his CODE 2015 promotion campaign to Dalhousie University, where he'll join XMG Studio Inc. founder Ray Sharma to "share details and highlights regarding the next iteration of this outstanding appathon."
  • In Saint-Felicien, Infrastructure Minister Denis Lebel promises news on the city's 150th anniversary celebrations.
  • Minister of State for Sport Bal Gosal makes an appearance at the 2015 National Soccer Coaching Conference at the Varsity Centre at the University of Toronto.
  • Finally, International Trade Minister Ed Fast hosts a "Go Global Export Workshop" in Edmonton.

Mobile readers: Follow the Parliament Hill ticker here.

For up to the minute dispatches from the precinct and beyond, keep your eye on the Parliament Hill Ticker:


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Canadian troops try to avoid danger spots, chief of defence staff tells MPs

Chief of Defence Staff Tom Lawson says Canada's special forces aren't put into places where they expect to come under fire.

Speaking to MPs at the House foreign affairs committee, Lawson said despite spending 20 per cent of their time near the front lines, the special forces have had to return fire only three times.

"So although the risk is low, and we continue to think it is low in that role, it is not zero," Lawson said.

"We in no way put our special operations troops anywhere near where we believe they will come under fire."

Lawson was at committee to brief MPs on the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) with Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird and Defence Minister Rob Nicholson.

MPs questioned Lawson, Baird and Nicholson on the scope of the mission and whether Canadian soldiers are involved in ground combat, leading at times to some testy exchanges. Government MPs accused the opposition of not supporting the Canadian Armed Forces and NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar at one point heckled Nicholson when he didn't feel Nicholson was answering his questions.

Defence officials recently revealed that special forces operators who had been described as working in an "advise and assist" role have actually exchanged fire with ISIS forces three times.

Not combat, top soldier says

On Thursday, NDP defence critic Jack Harris lodged a formal complaint against Prime Minister Stephen Harper for providing "misleading information" to the House of Commons on the scope of Canada's military efforts in Iraq.

Liberal MP Marc Garneau read the Canadian Armed Forces' definition of a combat operation, which includes the necessity of lethal force, and asked whether that is what the military is doing in Iraq.

"It is not," Lawson said.

The Canadian special forces operators, he said, are providing Peshmerga, the Kurdish forces with whom the Canadians are working, the ability to "heighten the accuracy of the weapons" used.

Accompanying troops has a different meaning in military doctrine than in normal language, Lawson added.

"In military terms, as you are quoting doctrine, it has a very clear other meaning. And that is that you are now up front, with the troops that you have been assigned to, with your weapons being used to compel the enemy. So there is no confusion with our special operators on that accompany role."

Calling in targets

Canadian officials have said the special forces are calling in, or painting, targets for the Iraqi forces, though Nicholson wouldn't say when that happened.

"This has been an evolutionary process, working with them right from the start," Nicholson said. 

"They're moving forward and that's what we are very, very proud [of]."

Harris said the real issue is whether Canadians were misinformed by the prime minister.

"Canadians have to be able to trust what they're told by the prime minister. If we see evolution, what we call mission creep and potential escalation, the question is what's next and what's this going to lead to. That's very concerning here when we don't really trust what this government is telling Canadians and telling Parliament."

The House of Commons voted in support of a six-month air bombing mission in October (the government doesn't need parliamentary approval to deploy the military).

The government committed 600 troops, one CC-150 Polaris air-to-air refuelling aircraft, two CP-140 Aurora surveillance aircraft, and the necessary air crews and support personnel. Canada also sent six CF-18 fighter jets and one dedicated airlift plane to enhance the refuelling, air surveillance and transportation capacity of coalition members.

Those are in addition to a commitment of up to 69 special forces troops who work on the ground with Iraqi forces.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

CSIS to be given 'power to disrupt,' not arrest, in new anti-terror bill

Canada's spy agency is expected to be given new powers to stop would-be Canadian jihadists before they leave the country as part of sweeping new anti-terrorism measures being unveiled Friday.

Sources familiar with the proposed legislation tell CBC News the goal is to give the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service the kinds of legal tools that are available to intelligence services in other Western countries.

The expected new powers would allow CSIS agents to obtain court orders to:

  • cancel plane or other travel reservations made by Canadians suspected of wanting to join the Islamic State or other extremists groups overseas;
  • block any financial transactions linked to suspected terrorist activity;
  • intercept shipments of Canadian-made equipment or material to Canadian individuals or groups that could be used in an attack;
  • switch, or make suspect equipment being shipped unusable as part of an on-going investigation.

Under existing law, CSIS must  rely on the RCMP to do these things, and government officials say that can lead to costly delays and, in some cases, an inability to act because the RCMP requires a higher standard of proof to arrest or detain suspects.

Work on the bill began immediately after the Oct. 22 attack on Parliament Hill by Michael Zehaf-Bibeau.

The lone gunman stormed Parliament Hill after shooting Cpl. Nathan Cirillo as he stood guard at the National War Memorial.

Just two days earlier, Martin Couture-Rouleau used his car to run down Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Que.

CBC News reported earlier this month that the RCMP had tried to obtain a peace bond against Couture-Rouleau a few weeks earlier but weren't able to muster sufficient evidence. 

Power to disrupt

"The goal is for CSIS to move from an intelligence-gathering service to an agency that will have the power to disrupt or diminish potential terrorist threats under appropriate judicial oversight,'' a source told CBC News.

But CSIS agents will not be given the power to arrest or detain Canadians. That power will continue to reside with the RCMP and other police forces.

Expanding the mandate given CSIS is just one of many changes expected in the massive bill, which will have five distinct sections, to be tabled in the Commons on Friday. Prime Minister Stephen Harper will hold a news conference to discuss the measures later in the day.

Harper National Security 20150129

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and York Regional Police Chief Eric Jolliffe take part in a discussion with law enforcement officials regarding issues related to national security in Aurora, Ont., on Thursday. New legislation is coming. (The Canadian Press)

"We are not under any illusion of the evolving multiple threats that we face," Harper said Thursday in Aurora, north of Toronto.

"It's difficult to predict them all, but we must continually evolve and improve our tools to do everything we can in what are obviously dangerous situations for the Canadian public, situations that we are seeing more and more frequently all over the world."

CBC News has already reported that the government intends to amend a number of laws to provide national security agencies with explicit authority to obtain and share information that is now subject to privacy limits.

Sources also confirm that the proposed legislation is expected to create a number of new criminal offences. Key among those is to make it an offence for anyone to "advocate or promote" terrorism online or through social media.

The law now makes it illegal for anyone to "counsel" someone to commit a terrorist act.

And the new bill is expected to extend the length of time police can detain a person without charge if they are suspected of being involved in a possible terrorist act.

Freedom of speech

Britain already allows anyone suspected of terrorism links to be detained for up to 14 days. Britain and France, in the wake of the massacre at the satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo, earlier this month, are also looking at laws to make it easier to trace the identities of anyone promoting terrorist activities online.

Canadian civil rights experts have warned these kinds of powers may violate the Charter of Rights guarantees to security of person and freedom of speech.

But government officials say they're confident the proposed measures are consistent with Canadian law.

Even so, sources tell CBC News that work on the proposed bill continued into this week, as government lawyers wrestled with the Charter implications of the new powers.

Several investigations into the October attacks are still ongoing.

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson has told reporters that investigators recovered a video Zehaf-Bibeau made the day before the Ottawa attack which includes statements that show he was driven by ideological and political motives.

That video has not been released.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Premiers gather in Ottawa to discuss trade, climate, health care

Prime Minister Stephen Harper invited to event, but won't attend

By Lee-Anne Goodman, The Canadian Press Posted: Jan 30, 2015 6:37 AM ET Last Updated: Jan 30, 2015 8:09 AM ET

Canada's premiers meet today to discuss a range of issues that include climate change, infrastructure, internal trade barriers and the health-care needs of the country's seniors.

The premiers — all but Alberta's Jim Prentice and Saskatchewan's Brad Wall — are gathering at a conference centre just a few blocks from Prime Minister Stephen Harper's office.

The prime minister was invited to the meeting by Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, but won't be showing up.

On the eve of the event, both Wynne and Liberal leader Justin Trudeau chided Harper for his failure to attend yet another Council of the Federation meeting.

They also accused the federal government of an absence of leadership that has all but forced the provinces and territories to tackle carbon pricing and climate change on their own.

Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard is scheduled to update his counterparts about the so-called Canadian Energy Strategy today.

It's an initiative involving all 13 provinces and territories focused on climate change and clean energy.

Health care and aging is also on the agenda of the meeting.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Bill rises again for 'royal' treatment of European guests

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 29 Januari 2015 | 21.16

It was a grand affair — which is just as well. For $162,863, you want more than cheese dip and some dried-up carrots.

But then, the plan called for "royal" treatment of the visitors. The Prime Minister's Office had insisted on that when Herman Van Rompuy, then president of the European Council, and José Manuel Barroso, then head of the European Commission, stopped in Ottawa last Sept. 26.

After all, the occasion marked the end of negotiations — OK, nearly the end — for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), the long-sought free-trade agreement between Canada and the European Union.

And the PMO could hardly complain that it wasn't royal enough. The food, the drinks and the room at Toronto's Royal York Hotel cost a little north of $50,000.

But only a cheapskate would leave it at that. And, in a new update to an earlier disclosure that pegged overall costs at $121,454, it seems the bill has edged substantially upwards — by about $40,000.

In a just-released written reply to Arnold Chan, the Liberal MP for Scarborough-Agincourt, the government reveals that flying 17 staffers from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to Toronto cost $23,000. A motorcade to get everyone from downtown Ottawa to the airport cost $21,000. Vehicle rentals added $12,000 more.

A previous disclosure revealed the event caused $9,533 in overtime for the RCMP.

But the entertainment at the Royal York beano was surely a bargain — just $10,400 to bring in a military band and Canadian quartet The Tenors to serenade guests as they rubbed shoulders with the European delegation.

Harper EU 20140926

Prime Minister Stephen Harper, centre, arrives with Herman Van Rompuy, left, then-president of the European Council, and José Manuel Barroso, right, then-president of the European Commission, in Toronto Sept. 26 for a reception to promote the Canada-EU trade deal. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)

True, the European leaders had already enjoyed a full-dress reception on Parliament Hill — inspection of the honour guard, parade down the Hall of Honour, signing ceremony, the works. And, true, the visitors had a commercial flight booked back from Ottawa to Brussels.

But the government insisted they stay for a second reception in Toronto, to meet the business elite. And nobody was going to tell Jose Manuel Barroso to — what? Grab a cab to the airport and take the red-eye? And end up cooling his heels in a transit lounge in Frankfurt?

That wouldn't do. So the government famously agreed to fly the guests home to Brussels in the prime minister's Airbus, at a cost of at least $300,000.

CETA summit reception expenses, DFATD

A list of reception expenses paid by the Department of Foreign Affairs, released this week. (Dept. of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development)

That much we knew — and, next to that, the reception may seem like a trifle. But it had to be done right. It seems the backdrops for the stage — just the backdrops — cost more than $19,000. The staging and the audio-visual setup added nearly $15,000 to that.

But the translation was a steal! Just $919 to translate both the program and the menu!

In fairness, it was a pretty big affair. The guest list included a who's-who of Canadian business: bankers, auto executives, BlackBerry, SNC Lavalin, Bombardier, Tim Horton's and, of course, Mercedes-Benz. CBC News has learned that members of the Conservative Party's National Council were also invited.

So — was it worth it? Buried in the answer to Arnold Chan's question, the government's written reply handles the matter tactfully.

It says that it has "no information with regard to a value-for-money assessment for the Toronto event."

CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

'What's a Tim Hortons' voter? New dictionary explains

A new online dictionary is seeking to demystify obscure Canadian parliamentary terms and phrases for the average civilian — or should we say the "Tim Hortons' voter?"

If you've ever wanted to know who "Premier Dad" is, or what the name of a popular orange carbonated beverage has to do with Canadian politics, look no further.

Parli is a dictionary of Canadian politics started by Campbell Strategies, a public affairs consultancy firm. It was launched earlier this week.

"I think there are a number [of entries] that are amusing," says Barry Campbell, a former Liberal MP and president of the firm.

"This is also serious history, but I think top of the list of most amusing and almost forgotten might be 'Salmon-Arm Salute,' which was a rather crude gesture that prime minister [Pierre] Trudeau made from a train car."

Here are a few other entries you can find in the dictionary:

Do you know any other terms that the dictionary is missing? Leave a comment below. To submit terms directly to Parli, head to their website or send a tweet to @parlidotca.

"This will live and keep on going," Campbell says. "We're adding as we go. We will of course, in a very Canadian way, try to be very serious about the definitions but have a little bit of fun, too."


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

CSE's Levitation project: Does mass surveillance prevent terrorist attacks?

Mass trolling of internet data — as done by Canada's electronic spy agency in a project dubbed Levitation — can impede cyber spies in the hunt for extremists more than it helps, some security experts argue.

"We've focused too much on bulk collection just because there's a capacity to survey broad swaths of digital communication and collect it and store it, potentially indefinitely," says Adam Molnar, a Canadian security expert teaching at an Australian university.

But that collection may not only be harmful to privacy and civil liberties concerns, but ineffective as well, the Deakin University lecturer argues.

"Even in instances where we see an attack occur, these agencies are drowning in data and they're not even able to follow up on specific leads."

Molnar cites the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing and the recent Paris attacks as cases where information was gathered on suspects, "but it made very little difference."

In light of Canada's own attacks on soldiers, U.S. journalist Glenn Greenwald said Canadians should be asking tough questions.

"It raises a real question about why these Western intelligence agencies that are spending so much money on these very sophisticated means of surveillance can't find individuals who are planning attacks like that?" asks Greenwald.

The constitutional lawyer and author is famous for helping publish a trove of top-secret documents obtained by U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden over the past two years. Revelations from the Snowden files have prompted debates about privacy and security around the world.

Greenwald was part of a team from the U.S.-based news site The Intercept who worked in collaboration with CBC News to analyze Canada-related Snowden files.

Those files included a 2012 presentation by a team at Canada's Communications Security Establishment (CSE), which is taxed with electronically monitoring security threats abroad. The presentation revealed CSE's sweeping access to videos, music and documents shared on free file-hosting websites through a project it codenamed Levitation.

Under Levitation, the electronic spy agency was sifting through up to 15 million uploads or downloads each day from around the world as part of a counterterrorism effort. But, according to the presentation, only 350 downloads each month triggered any kind of follow-up — an extremely small portion of the indiscriminately collected data.

The way the program worked was that the CSE tapped into collected metadata on those downloads. It then used the  computer's IP addresses to cross-reference that through at least two wide-reaching databases of metadata held by Canada's spying partners to try to figure out a suspect's identity and to further monitor that person's online activity.

New legislation coming

Questions about the effectiveness of mass surveillance are being raised as the Canadian government plans to introduce new legislation Friday to give security agencies broader powers. The new rules come in the wake of two attacks on Canadian soldiers last year as well as a growing number of extremist incidents around the world.

Wesley Wark, a national security expert, says that no matter how many "interesting needles" come out of the haystack of online data, spy agencies still need to translate that to "usable intelligence" – meaning something they can act on.

"At the end of the day, one piece of good intelligence might be worth it all," says Wark, who is currently at the University of Ottawa.

In its 2012 presentation to its "Five Eyes" spying partners — the group that includes the U.S., U.K., New Zealand and Australia — the CSE mentioned two important successes from the Levitation project.

The first involved the discovery of an uploaded document that outlined the hostage strategy of AQIM, the North African branch of al-Qaeda. That strategy was "disseminated widely," including by the CIA to its overseas counterparts, the CSE presentation says.

glenn greenwald

U.S. journalist Glenn Greenwald says Canadians need to ask tough questions about how effective mass surveillance is in light of two attacks on soldiers. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Cyber analysts also unearthed a video of a German hostage from a previously unknown target. That hostage died in late May 2012, months after spies came across the video.

Edgar Fritz Raupach, an engineer working in Nigeria, was killed by his hostage-takers when local soldiers — who were unaware of Raupach's presence — attacked the captors' hideout in an unrelated operation.

Wark cautions that the document — as a presentation by CSE to its spying partners — is inevitably biased toward touting the most favourable results. Ultimately, he says, success in this business depends on whether the findings were timely, didn't consume too many resources and were useful.

"These Canadian documents suggest it can pay off," says Wark. "So, does it pay off? Is it proportionate to the resources we're putting into it? Are there different ways to do it?"

Vital role

It is not known whether the Levitation project is still ongoing. CSE says it can't comment on details of the program, citing the Security of Information Act.

Julian Fantino, the associate minister of national defence, told CBC News in a statement that CSE's foreign signals intelligence have "played a vital role in uncovering foreign-based extremists' efforts to attract, radicalize and train individuals to carry out attacks in Canada and abroad."

"Our government will not sit idly by while terrorists use websites to attract, radicalize and train individuals who threaten our values and freedom."

Veterans Affairs Minister Julian Fantino

Julian Fantino, the associate minister of national defence, says the government will "not sit idly by while terrorists use websites to attract, radicalize and train individuals who threaten our values and freedom." (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

As for the new bill coming Friday, Employment Minister Jason Kenney said the objective is to stop attacks before they happen by targeting what's being called incitement to terrorism.

Sources told CBC News that the legislation will give security agencies the ability to obtain and share information now subject to privacy limits, and make it easier for police to detain suspected extremists.

However, Liberal MP Joyce Murray says while there's been calls for the government to tighten up security, privacy concerns must not be forgotten.

"They need to also look at the provisions to protect individual privacy," said Murray. "And the government has failed to do that."

Murray says laws governing the CSE are 14 years out of date and don't touch on metadata.

The so-called data about data — which for email can include information such as recipients, subject lines and dates — falls outside the old laws because it isn't considered "private communication." Only the contents of an email or a conversation during a phone call are considered a communication.

Big topic in U.S.

While there has been relatively little debate in Canada weighing privacy concerns in the face of security fears, it's been a hot topic in the U.S. since most of the Snowden revelations involve CSE's counterpart, the National Security Agency.

Last year, a Washington-based non-profit analyzed 225 terrorism cases inside the U.S. since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and found that bulk collection of phone records by NSA had "no discernible impact" on preventing acts of terrorism.

The non-profit New America Foundation said the bulk collection of phone metadata — which includes phones called and call duration — had, in its view, only marginal impacts on preventing terrorist-related activities.

The organization said in most cases it was traditional law enforcement and investigative methods involving a tip or evidence that resulted in initiating action against an individual or group.

That finding came on the heels of a White House-appointed review committee that drew a similar conclusion. It said that much of the evidence that NSA turned up from tracking phone calls could have "readily been obtained" using standard court orders. It found that the phone metadata collection program was "not essential to preventing attacks."

For Molnar, the lessons from the U.S. are clear. "It tells us that [bulk collection] actually does very little in terms of identifying unknown suspects or actually detecting and preventing attacks before they occur."

Similar analyses on the effectiveness of gathering so much online metadata haven't been done since much less is known about the programs collecting them, says Tamir Israel, a lawyer with the University of Ottawa's Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic.

Ultimately, the invasion of privacy is disproportionate to the benefit, he says.

Earlier this week, a report by Europe's top rights body said that mass surveillance programs are endangering fundamental human rights, including the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of religion.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe said it is"deeply worried" about the use of secrecy laws and secrecy courts — all of which is "very poorly scrutinized."

"In the long term, this type of unfettered surveillance is a really insidious thing that can really have very serious negative impacts on the way democratic institutions work," says Israel.

On mobile? Click here for a look at the step-by-step Levitation process


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

New anti-terror bill could put chill on freedom of speech

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said last weekend that new anti-terror legislation to be introduced on Friday will, among other things, "criminalize the promotion of terrorism."

Such a move, however, could have a chilling effect on freedom of expression in Canada and would not necessarily contribute to effectively fighting domestic extremism, according to legal experts.

The new bill aimed at combating domestic threats was promised by the federal government in the weeks following the October attacks in Quebec and Ottawa that left two members of the Canadian Forces dead.

Justice Minister Peter MacKay suggested that the measures would, among a host of other consequences, allow authorities to target materials that may be contributing to the radicalization of Canadians, particularly online.

The new bill, however, is largely a knee-jerk response to October's attacks and Canada already has the necessary laws on the books to pursue and prosecute people promoting hatred or inciting violence, says Kent Roach, a professor at the University of Toronto who specializes in constitutional and terrorism law.

"The government has the burden before they introduce new laws to demonstrate why it's not possible to prosecute these kinds of offences under existing Canadian law," he says.

"There's a real danger when we make laws in reaction to events with the assumption that those laws will help prevent tragedies from happening again."

Government officials have repeatedly stated that any new legislation would be drafted in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and will not infringe on freedom of expression and religion.

'Glorification' offences

Similar legislation criminalizing the "glorification" of terrorist acts exists in several European countries, and MacKay said last year that the government was reviewing specific laws in the U.K. as a possible template.

Earlier this month, Roach co-authored a working paper with Craig Forcese, an associate professor of law at the University of Ottawa, that analyzed the prospect of a Canadian law targeting glorification of terrorism offences.

'Sometimes these things can become wins for extremists and terrorists. They are trying to provoke further attacks and if the response reinforces their perspective on the state of the world, then it ends up helping their cause. '- Scott Stewart, VP of tactical analysis at Stratfor

Pushing the limits on what kinds of speech are considered criminal may put a "chill" on the dialogue around terrorism, they wrote, particularly in communities where discussing the issues around radicalization and extremism is most critical.

"There are at least two concerns about speech chill: will people not talk about controversial topics because they're worried about being charged under a new offence? And second, will it drive potentially radicalized individuals further underground?" says Roach.

When people don't feel free to talk about the political, religious and ideological elements of extremism, Canadian society won't be able to address the underlying forces that drive people toward radicalization and, in some cases, to acts of violence, says University of Waterloo sociology and legal studies professor Lorne Dawson.

'It's silencing'

Dawson does extensive research within communities dealing with radicalization. He says many people are already reluctant to speak openly about the subject.

"If we expand our laws, it will stoke the fear that people are susceptible to prosecution just by the suggestion that that they may empathize in part with the world view of people that are considered terrorists, but they themselves would never do anything violent or hateful," says Dawson.

"There is already an increasing sense that it is a forbidden topic — it's too potentially dangerous and words could be misconstrued or misunderstood. It's silencing."

While there is no question that extremist networks use the internet to communicate and promote their causes, mounting evidence has shown online activity is not always a driving force on the path to radicalization.

Bob Paulson RCMP

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson in October outlined his force's plan to lead an anti-radicalization program in communities nationwide. These kinds of preventive measures are more effective than clamping down on speech, legal experts say. (Blair Gable/Reuters)

"The internet might be a facilitator, but it's not the cause," says Forcese, who argued in his paper with Roach that contact with a charismatic thought leader is almost certainly the strongest influence on those moving toward extreme viewpoints.

The RCMP has already begun developing an anti-radicalization program in conjunction with local police forces, and if a community leader was inciting people to join extremist movements, their actions are already illegal under the Criminal Code.

Making 'martyrs' of ideas

Similarly, stifling speech plays into the narrative promoted by many extremist groups that Western societies are hypocritical to espouse free speech values while repressing contradictory views. In essence, says Forcese, these kinds of laws can make "martyrs of ideas" and speech that lie within the definition of protected speech. 

The ultimate result is to provide propagandists and recruiters in foreign groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda, which are far out of reach of Canadian law, another weapon in their arsenal. 

"Sometimes these things can become wins for extremists and terrorists," says Scott Stewart, vice-president of tactical analysis at Stratfor, a U.S.-based private intelligence and consulting firm.

'It seems to me that Canada's legal house is pretty much in order. The problem in Canada is not that the laws aren't on the books, but rather the enforcement of those laws. '- Kent Roach, U of T law professor

"They are trying to provoke further attacks and if the response reinforces their perspective on the state of the world, then it ends up helping their cause."

On the other hand, it can be helpful to provide resource-strapped counterterrorism forces with additional tools in the uphill battle against homegrown threats. That was the fundamental basis for the laws that were passed in the U.K., and Stewart says Canada's new legislation could be sculpted in the image of those laws.

While critics of the U.K.'s approach to glorification offences argue there is room for abuses, particularly when it comes to the expression of political and religious ideologies, "the British have addressed the possibility of overstepping by surgically applying the laws," says Stewart.

Enforcement of existing laws

While the U.K.'s efforts have arguably been effective, "Canada can already accomplish what the U.K. has done in terms of most prosecutions" under laws already in place, Roach and Forcese wrote.

"It seems to me that Canada's legal house is pretty much in order," says Roach. "The problem in Canada is not that the laws aren't on the books, but rather the enforcement of those laws."

London bombings 2005

The U.K. enacted a series of laws that criminalized the "glorification" of terrorism following the 2005 attacks on London's public transit system that killed 52 people. (Dylan Martinez/Reuters)

For example, Canadian legislation allows for a judge to issue a warrant that would force internet service providers or individual websites to take down material if it can be shown that it falls outside of constitutionally protected speech.

The kinds of terrorist propaganda targeted by U.K. law could largely fall under this category in Canada, according to Roach.

Interestingly, there's no publicly available evidence that the provision has ever been used by Canadian law enforcement since being enacted shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.  

He points to a history of co-operation between MI-5, the U.K.'s domestic intelligence agency, and police forces throughout the country as the primary reason for the U.K.'s ability to keep tabs on homegrown extremism.

'Political posturing'

CBC News reported earlier this month that the new anti-terror legislation will likely include provisions to allow increased information-sharing between federal agencies, currently limited by privacy laws.

Ultimately, pushing the limits of criminalized speech in the digital age "is not going to stop the spread of information and it's not going to reduce the flow of propaganda," asserts Dawson.

Rather, it is intended to convey the message that Canada as a nation is trying to do something to combat domestic threats.

"It's really more political posturing than sound counterterrorism policy."


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

John Baird, Rob Nicholson to take Iraq mission questions at committee

The swirl of confusion over the nature and scope of Canada's ongoing military operations in Iraq will take centre stage on the Hill this morning, where a special joint meeting of the House foreign affairs and defence committees will — at least in theory — provide the first official briefing on the mission since the House broke for the holidays in December.

On the witness list for today's 90-minute session: Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird and Defence Minister Rob Nicholson, as well as their respective seconds-in-command: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Daniel Jean and Chief of Defence Staff Tom Lawson.

Likely to be at the top of the agenda, at least for those on the opposition side of the table, will almost certainly be what they see as a growing list of still unanswered questions arising from recent revelations on the extent of Canadian activities near the front lines, which have resulted in Canadian Forces coming under enemy fire on at least three occasions in the last two weeks.

Back in the Chamber, Liberal MPs will spend the day making their respective and collective case for the party's first opposition day motion of the new year, which would, if passed, see the House express its non-binding view that the Prime Minister of Canada "should hold annual First Ministers' Conferences."

In what may or may not be a serendipitous twist of timing, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is scheduled to hold a one-on-one First Minister Meeting of his own with visiting Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne later this morning.

This evening, Liberal MP Ted Hsu will make one final attempt to persuade his Commons colleagues to back his private members' bid to restore the long-form census, which is set to undergo a final round of second reading debate.

  • Liberal MP Irwin Cotler teams up with New Democrats Pierre-Luc Dusseault and Wayne Marston, as well as Amnesty International representatives, to call for the release of Saudi blogger Raif Badawi — to whom, the advisory notes, Cotler is now serving as international legal counsel — whose wife, Ensaf Haidar, is also expected to be in attendance.
  • Operation SIRONA Task Force Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Gary O'Neil holds a teleconference to brief reporters on the latest developments in the Canadian Armed Forces' ongoing efforts to respond to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Stephen Harper heads back to Southern Ontario, where he's scheduled to join Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino and local MPs Lois Brown and Roxanne James for a "roundtable discussion" — at York Regional Police headquarters in Aurora.

Elsewhere on the ministerial circuit:

  • Citizenship and Immigration Minister Chris Alexander will be front and centre at the 2014 Immigration Entrepreneur Awards hosted by the City of Ottawa, which will be handed out at a mid-morning ceremony at a downtown hotel.
  • In Waterloo, International Trade Minister Ed Fast hosts a "Go Global" export workshop alongside Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president Jayson Meyers.
  • Treasury Board President Tony Clement "continues his nationwide tour" in support of CODE 2015 – The Canadian Open Data Experience" with a stop in Montreal, where he will "share details and highlights" of the upcoming instalment of what his own release calls an "outstanding appathon."
  • Finally, Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz joins Saskatchewan Jobs Minister Jeremy Harrison at a Regina-based machine shop, where the pair will reveal the identity of the province's very first Canada Job Grant recipient.

Mobile readers: Follow the Parliament Hill ticker here.

For up to the minute dispatches from the precinct and beyond, keep your eye on the Parliament Hill Ticker:


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

New Conservative anti-terror bill needs to walk a fine line, Jason Kenney says

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 28 Januari 2015 | 21.16

There's a fine line between legitimate religious expression and inciting terrorism, says Conservative employment minister Jason Kenney, who also manages the multiculturalism portfolio.

It's that line the government will be walking — carefully — in its new anti-terrorism bill, expected to be unveiled Friday.

The bill is the government's long-awaited legislative response to two attacks carried out on Canadian soldiers last fall by men believed to have been influenced by radical Islam — attacks the government considers acts of terrorism.

Though police already have the power to go after those suspecting of being on the verge of committing terrorist attacks, the new bill is partially aimed at stopping the seeds of those attacks from germinating altogether.

"Our objective is not to diminish legitimate expression of political or religious views, but rather incitement to terrorism — and there is a fine line there that the legislation will try to draw," Kenney said in an interview Tuesday.

"Obviously there are some malevolent religious influences that can add to the process of radicalization towards violent extremism, and we have to be extremely mindful of that."

Radicalization efforts 'somewhere where we do need action': Uppal

How to effectively combat radicalization is a struggle facing governments and security agencies the world over.

The RCMP is currently rolling out its own strategy, which includes working more closely with community groups in order to identify and divert people who may be susceptible to extreme views that could eventually lead to violence.

But the police need broader powers to deal with those doing the radicalizing, suggested Conservative MP Tim Uppal, who is also the minister of state for multiculturalism.

"If the police are doing their investigation and they come across people who are trying to radicalize others, before any type of violence ... I think that's somewhere where we do need some action," Uppal told The Canadian Press recently.

The other problem facing legislators is how to handle radicalization online, which many acknowledge is the primary source of information for young men and women who later end up joining violent causes.

"We need to be able to follow up on and see how we can ensure that we are able to either stop those messages that people are getting, or at least be able to follow up on it in some way," Uppal said.

But Liberal public safety critic Wayne Easter said he wonders why existing anti-terror laws of various kinds haven't been put to full use.

Release of Parliament Hill shooter video now uncertain

"The government has not given us any answer," said Easter, who is calling on the RCMP to release the video Michael Zehaf Bibeau made before he killed Cpl. Nathan Cirillo at the National War Memorial.

RCMP commissioner Bob Paulson has said Zehaf Bibeau appeared "lucid" and "purposeful" in spelling out his motives, which Paulson described as being rooted in his religious beliefs and opinion of Canada's foreign policy.

Paulson initially said he wanted to see the footage released to the public, but has since signalled that may not happen.

Easter said he'd like to know if the message on the video lines up with what federal officials have said about it.

"Maybe it doesn't match with the prime minister's messaging," he said.

"Now, that would be a sad commentary, if the commissioner of the RCMP is being led down that path. But we'll see."


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

CSE tracks millions of downloads daily: Snowden documents

Canada's electronic spy agency sifts through millions of videos and documents downloaded online every day by people around the world, as part of a sweeping bid to find extremist plots and suspects, CBC News has learned.

Details of the Communications Security Establishment project dubbed "Levitation" are revealed in a document obtained by U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden and recently released to CBC News.

rapidshare cse

Rapidshare was one of three file-sharing websites targeted in the spy agency's surveillance. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Under Levitation, analysts with the electronic eavesdropping service can access information on about 10 to 15 million uploads and downloads of files from free websites each day, the document says.

"Every single thing that you do — in this case uploading/downloading files to these sites — that act is being archived, collected and analyzed," says Ron Deibert, director of the University of Toronto-based internet security think-tank Citizen Lab, who reviewed the document.

In the document, a PowerPoint presentation written in 2012, the CSE analyst who wrote it jokes about being overloaded with innocuous files such as episodes of the musical TV series Glee in their hunt for terrorists.

CBC analyzed the document in collaboration with the U.S. news website The Intercept, which obtained it from Snowden.

The presentation provides a rare glimpse into Canada's cyber-sleuthing capabilities and its use of its spy partners' immense databases to track the online traffic of millions of people around the world, including Canadians.

That glimpse may be of even greater interest now that the Harper government plans to introduce new legislation increasing the powers of Canada's security agencies. 

Though Canada's always been described as a junior partner in the Five Eyes spying partnership, which includes the U.S., Britain, New Zealand and Australia, this document shows it led the way in developing this new extremist-tracking tool.

"It's really the first time that a story has been reported that involves [CSE] as the lead agency in a program of pure mass surveillance," said Glenn Greenwald, a constitutional lawyer and journalist with The Intercept, and who has been instrumental in bringing Snowden's information to public attention.

Canada's electronic surveillance service said it cannot comment on the specific program, but added that some of its metadata analysis is designed to identify foreign terrorists who use the internet for activities threatening the security of Canada and Canadians.


On mobile? Click here for Levitation file

"CSE is clearly mandated to collect foreign signals intelligence to protect Canada and Canadians from a variety of threats to our national security, including terrorism," agency spokesman Andrew McLaughlin wrote in an email to CBC.

Deibert, at the Citizen Lab, says that on the surface the Levitation program is reassuring, indicating Canada's spies are doing their job, but he adds that the mass surveillance nature of it raises questions.

'A giant X-ray machine'

According to the document, Canada can access data from 102 free file upload sites, though only three file-host companies are named: Sendspace, Rapidshare and the now-defunct Megaupload.

Sendspace told CBC News that "no organization has the ability/permission to trawl/search Sendspace for data," and its policy states it won't disclose user identities unless legally required.

Tamir Israel CIPPIC

Tamir Israel, an internet policy lawyer, says the program raises questions because it's "completely at the discretion of CSE essentially what documents to pick." (Amber Hildebrandt/CBC News)

No other file-sharing company responded to CBC requests for comment.

However, the Levitation document says that access to the data comes from unnamed "special sources," a term that in previous Snowden documents seemed to refer to telecommunications companies or cable operators.

It is also unclear which, or how many, of the Five Eyes access information on these uploaded files and whether the companies involved know the spy agencies have this access.

Many people use file-sharing websites to share photos, videos, music and documents, but these cyber-lockers have also been accused of being havens for illegally sharing copyrighted content.

Not surprisingly, extremists also use the online storage hubs to share propaganda and training materials.

To find those files, the document says Canada's spy agency must first weed out the so-called Glee episodes as well as pictures of cars on fire and vast amounts of other content unrelated to terrorism.

Analysts find 350 "interesting download events" each month, less than 0.0001 per cent of the total collected traffic, according to the top-secret presentation.

Surveillance specialists can then retrieve the metadata on a suspicious file, and use it to map out a day's worth of that file user's online activity.

By inputting other bits of information into at least two databases created by the spying partners, analysts can discover the identity and online behaviour of those uploading or downloading these files, as well as, potentially, new suspicious documents.

The Levitation project illustrates the "giant X-ray machine over all our digital lives," says Deibert.

From IP to ID

Once a suspicious file-downloader is identified, analysts can plug that IP address into Mutant Broth, a database run by the British electronic spy agency Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), to see five hours of that computer's online traffic before and after the download occurred.


On mobile? Click here for CSE response

That can sometimes lead them to a Facebook profile page and to a string of Google and other cookies used to track online users' activities for advertising purposes. This can help identify an individual.

In one example in the top-secret document, analysts also used the U.S. National Security Agency's powerful Marina database, which keeps online metadata on people for up to a year, to search for further information about a target's Facebook profile. It helped them find an email address.

After doing its research, the Levitation team then passes on a list of suspects to CSE's Office of Counter Terrorism.

The agency cites two successes as of 2012: the discovery of a German hostage video through a previously unknown target, and an uploaded document that gave it the hostage strategy of a terrorist organization.

It's unclear from the leaked document how long Levitation was operational and whether it is still in use.

CSE says its foreign signals intelligence has "played a vital role in uncovering foreign-based extremists' efforts to attract, radicalize and train individuals to carry out attacks in Canada and abroad." But it offered no specifics about Levitation.

'What else can they do?'

Back in 2012, the spy agency appeared to be assessing the power and accuracy of the Levitation project as compared to other tools in its counterterrorism arsenal.

'The specific uses that they talk about in this context may not be the problem, but it's what else they can do.'- Tech lawyer Tamir Israel

Though the presentation jokes about filtering out Glee episodes, the issue underscores an increasing problem for spy agencies around the world: how the massive haystack of internet traffic they are collecting is straining spy agency resources.

Projects like Levitation aim to automate part of the process.

But it also causes some people to worry about what these powerful and secretive agencies can do with such an immense store of data at their fingertips.

"The specific uses that they talk about in this context may not be the problem, but it's what else they can do," says Tamir Israel, a lawyer with the University of Ottawa's Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic.

National security expert Wesley Wark says the Levitation documents clearly demonstrate the CSE's abilities. But he also warns the tool has the potential to be "hugely intrusive."

A recent story by The Guardian illustrates that potential. The British newspaper revealed that that the GCHQ scooped up emails to and from journalists working for some of the largest American and British media outlets, as part of a test exercise.

The story, based on Snowden documents, says GCHQ has also listed investigative journalists as a "threat" who rank somewhere between terrorists and hackers.

A similar issue could arise here, with the eavesdropping service choosing targets outside the terrorism realm, says Israel.

Academics, lawyers, journalists, activists and business people commonly use file-hosting sites as part of their jobs.

"It's completely at the discretion of CSE essentially what documents to pick," Israel says.

The mass surveillance by Canada's signals intelligence agency also raises questions about the number of Canadians inadvertently caught up in it.

In the Levitation presentation, two anonymous Canadian IP addresses from a Montreal-based data server appear on a list of suspicious downloads around the world. The list also included several from allies and trading partners, including the U.K., U.S., Spain, Brazil, Germany and Portugal.

By law, CSE isn't allowed to target Canadians. Canada's commissioner charged with reviewing the secretive group found it unintentionally swept up private communications of 66 Canadians while monitoring signals intelligence abroad, but concluded there was no sign of unlawful practice.

Canada is supposed to mask the identities of untargeted Canadians scooped up in its surveillance before passing information to its Five Eyes partners and law enforcement agencies.

Deibert says there are "all sorts of grey areas" in how CSE operates, including how long they can retain the data they collect, the volume of the mass collection, the rules around metadata and how this data is shared with spying partners.

"The mission is appropriate," he says. "But is engaging in wholesale mass surveillance the appropriate means to that end? Especially in the context where, in this country, you have very little oversight in any meaningful sense."

On mobile? Click here to see how spies track file downloads


CBC is working with U.S. news site The Intercept to shed light on Canada-related files in the cache of documents obtained by U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden. The CBC News team  Dave Seglins, Amber Hildebrandt and Michael Pereira  collaborated with The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Gallagher to analyze the documents. For a complete list of the past stories done by CBC on the Snowden revelations, see our topics page. Contact us by email by clicking on our respective names or search for our PGP keys here.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Federal election 2015: British Columbia setting up to be a 3-way contest

The outcome of the 2015 federal election may be decided in Ontario and Quebec, but British Columbia is shaping up to be the scene of some of the most competitive races in the country.

British Columbia is a real three-way contest. The latest poll averages put the Liberals at 31 per cent, against 28 per cent for the Conservatives and 26 per cent for the New Democrats. That five-point gap between first and third is the smallest in the country and is less than half the size of the margin between the first-place Liberals and third-place Bloc Québécois in Quebec.

And that means all three parties can win a significant number of seats in B.C.

Based on current support levels, the Conservatives would be able to win between 13 and 18 of the province's 42 seats, with the Liberals taking between 12 and 14, the New Democrats between 10 and 13, and the Greens as many as two.

This means the NDP is in a good position to hold the 12 seats they won in 2011, but the Conservatives could come down from the 21 they took in the last election. The Liberals, who only captured two B.C. seats in 2011, could be en route to their best performance in the province since 1968.

BC polling, Jan. 27

Weighted average of polls in British Columbia. (ThreeHundredEight.com)

Polls done since the beginning of December have ranged widely in the province, with the Liberals scoring between 27 and 45 per cent, the Conservatives between 19 and 36 per cent, and the NDP between 20 and 30 per cent. Each of these three parties has led in at least one of the last nine polls done in B.C.

Overall, however, the Liberals have been leading in the province since early December, when the Conservatives slipped slightly below 30 per cent. The New Democrats, meanwhile, have been improving their standing significantly since dropping to almost 20 per cent in November.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair has respectable numbers in B.C., scoring higher there on approval than anywhere except Quebec. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is also popular in the province — only in Atlantic Canada are his numbers better. Prime Minister Stephen Harper's ratings in B.C., on the other hand, are his worst west of Quebec.

Local contests

But if the country has its regional races, British Columbia also has its own sub-regional races. In only parts of the province are all three parties truly competitive.

The Conservatives look relatively secure in the Fraser Valley and the B.C. Interior, but in both regions of the province they can expect some tight battles with the New Democrats.

The NDP is better positioned in Burnaby and on Vancouver Island, where they would be favoured in most ridings. But on the island, the party is facing a new opponent in the Greens. Elizabeth May's party is currently polling at around 12 per cent provincewide and has its sights set on the riding of Victoria, which the Greens very nearly won in a 2012 byelection.

In Vancouver itself, the Liberals look poised to win a lot of new seats, squaring off with the NDP and Conservatives in a few of them.

Surrey could be one of the most interesting battlegrounds in the country. In the city's five seats, the Liberals are at play in four, the Conservatives in three and the NDP in two.

Battleground Alberta?

Less dramatic, though no less interesting, could be Alberta. The province that has been a solid Conservative bastion for ages (the party has won all or all but one of the seats in the province in each of the last three elections) is at no risk of turning over to one of the opposition parties. But that sea of blue could see a few more flecks of red and orange in 2015.

The Conservatives currently lead in the province with about 55 per cent support, followed by the Liberals at 24 per cent and the NDP at 14 per cent. The overall trend line in Alberta has been very steady for some time, and with current support levels the Conservatives would likely win 29 to 30 seats, with the NDP holding on to their one.

Alberta polling, Jan. 27

Weighted average of polls in Alberta. (ThreeHundredEight.com)

But on current support levels, the Liberals could potentially take three to four seats. That hasn't happened since 1993.

The reason for this is simple: having captured just 9 per cent of the vote in 2011, the party is now polling at almost three times that level of support. That gives them better than even odds in some individual ridings in Edmonton and Calgary, where, despite the Liberals' poor provincewide showing in the last election, they managed to capture 20 per cent of the vote or more.

Outside of the two big cities, the Conservatives should be in no danger. But the Liberals could make for some interesting contests in Calgary especially, and the New Democrats in Edmonton, where they could potentially pick up a second seat.

The political jostling here will pale in comparison to the epic battles in Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia. But with the 2015 election looking extremely close at this stage, every seat will count.


ThreeHundredEight.com's vote and seat projection model aggregates all publicly released polls, weighing them by sample size, date, and the polling firm's accuracy record. Upper and lower ranges are based on how polls have performed in other recent elections. The seat projection model makes individual projections for all ridings in the country, based on regional shifts in support since the 2011 election and taking into account other factors such as incumbency. The projections are subject to the margins of error of the opinion polls included in the model, as well as the unpredictable nature of politics at the riding level. The polls included in the model vary in size, date, and method, and have not been individually verified by the CBC. You can read the full methodology here.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

ISIS fight: Canadian advisers guiding airstrikes but U.S. barred from doing same

U.S. soldiers are not allowed to direct airstrikes on ISIS positions in Iraq, the Pentagon said on Tuesday, a practice that their Canadian military allies have been engaged in despite it being seen by some as a combat manoeuvre.

The Canadian government has acknowledged that Canadian advisers have been acting as forward observers, calling in airstrikes on ISIS positions and marking the targets with lasers.

But those roles are seen as combat roles. U.S. military Cmdr. Elissa Smith at the Pentagon told CBC News that that particular role — sometimes called JTAC or joint terminal attack controller — is one U.S. advisers on the ground in Iraq are barred from doing. 

"The advisers are assisting with planning ground operations, intelligence sharing, integrating air support into their operations, not as JTACs, but as planners," Smith said. "Their movements are carefully planned in advance in order to ensure that they are not inadvertently put into combat situations.

"We've been very clear that U.S. advisers are removed from actual or expected combat situations as part of our advise and assist mission in Iraq." 

'Definitely combat'

Last week, Brig.-Gen. Mike Rouleau, the commander of Canadian special forces, said his soldiers have directed 13 strikes.

Walter Dorn, who teaches defence studies to Canadian officers at Royal Military College, said what the JTACs are engaged in is "definitely combat."

"It's not just self-defence. It's actually engaging in combat and making a difference on the ground, in the field. And we originally said we are not going in there to engage in combat," he said.

When it comes to airstrikes, Steve Day, the former commander of Canada's elite JTF2 unit, said Western air forces always prefer to have their own trained soldiers guiding those attacks.

"The gold standard is to always receive intelligence from your own Western sources. So, it's always best, especially in built-up areas, to have a Western set of eyes looking at the target."

This is another case where Canadian forces seem to be going further than their coalition allies — at least publicly.

Military advisers in firefights

Although the U.S. is leading the coalition, officials say American military advisers aren't accompanying Iraqi forces on the frontlines. But Canadians have gone close to the frontlinesAt one point, the military estimated Canadian advisers spent 20 per cent of the time there. And those advisers have now been involved in three firefights.

In response to a question from CBC News on Monday, a spokeswoman for the Combined Joint Task Force, which is co-ordinating the international coalition's mission in Iraq, said, "Canada is the only coalition member whose soldiers have been involved in firefights."

The spokeswoman said she couldn't explain why, but when asked again on Tuesday by CBC News, she added:

"I can only respond on incidents that have been confirmed and reported to the high headquarters. The incidents with the Canadians are the only incidents that [have] been reported." 

However, Britain's Mail on Sunday, citing sources, reported that the U.K.'s elite SAS troops, who were officially in Iraq in a reconnaissance role, were conducting raids against ISIS fighters last November.

Countries rarely discuss special forces activities

David Perry, a senior security and defence analyst for the CDA Institute, said countries often don't want to talk about what their special forces are up to.

"We've seen it before in Libya and Afghanistan," he said. "Different governments for different reasons have been very reluctant and sensitive to discuss what their special operations forces do when they're out there on the ground."

Asked about the rules of engagement back in September, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Canadian troops were in Iraq "to advise and to assist. It is not to accompany."

But Harper was hammered in question period Tuesday about whether the government misled Canadians about the mission in Iraq,

He said that Canadian troops are executing the mission that Canadians and Parliament have given them. 

"They are advising, they are assisting," he said. "Guess what, if fired upon, they are going to shoot back; and if they kill some of the ISIL terrorists, Canadians are going to support that, no matter what the New Democrats think."

CDS meets Kurdish officials

An Iraqi news agency, BasNews, reported Tuesday that Chief of Defence Staff Tom Lawson was in Erbil over the weekend to meet with Kurdish officials, including Masrour Barzani, the chancellor of the Kurdistan Region Security Council.

Canada's Defence Department confirmed Lawson's travel to the region later in the day, saying the purpose of the meetings was to "exchange information, and to update them on Canada's ongoing contributions to the advise and assist mission."

The CDS also delivered a new shipment of non-lethal military gear from Canada, including clothing to equip the Iraqis for cold weather.

Canada's combat mission is up for renewal in April.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger