Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Dimitri Soudas fired as Conservative Party executive director

Written By Unknown on Senin, 31 Maret 2014 | 21.16

Dimitri Soudas has been forced out as the Conservative Party of Canada's executive director after trying to interfere with his fiancée's Conservative nomination battle.

Soudas, who was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's director of communications in 2011, has been the party's executive director since December. He worked for Harper for nine years, starting when Harper was the leader of the official opposition. Soudas left after the party won a majority government in May 2011, and took a job with the Canadian Olympic Committee. He left that job just days before the party announced they'd hired him in the top staff job.

Sources tell CBC News the party's national council was to be briefed on the move during a conference call at 9 p.m. ET.

Soudas's fiancée, Eve Adams, is fighting local chiropractor Natalia Lishchyna for the Conservative nomination in Oakville-North Burlington, a newly created riding that technically won't exist until the next election. Adams is the MP for Mississauga-Brampton South, a riding that's being split in 2015.

The Canadian Press has reported that tempers flared when Adams showed up at a riding board meeting March 19, and was asked to leave after an unpleasant exchange. Two separate Conservative sources said one board member threatened to call the police when she stayed on.

Soudas couldn't immediately be reached for comment.

A spokesman for the party confirmed that Soudas "stepped down as executive director" of the party, but wouldn't comment further. A source told the CBC's Hannah Thibedeau that Soudas was told to resign or he would be fired.

Conservative Party President John Walsh sent an email to the national council, obtained by CBC News, that named Simon Thompson as the interim executive director.

Thompson is currently the party's chief information officer. He started last September. Prior to that, he worked for Deloitte in Ottawa.

The combative Soudas was Harper's choice to run the party in the lead-up to the 2015 federal election. Soudas was appointed over the protests of cabinet ministers and national council members who pushed for other candidates. 

Harper short-circuited those candidacies by having council members to his living room at 24 Sussex Dr. for a show-of-hands vote on Soudas.

Soudas made hundreds of calls trying to drum up support Sunday as it became clear what was happening, sources told CBC News, but he had already angered many in the party — including some Conservative MPs ​— by getting involved in Adams's race in Burlington.

The conference call wasn't announced until late Sunday evening and members of the council weren't told what the call would be about, sources said.

On the night of the Oakville-North Burlington riding association board meeting earlier this month, Soudas was waiting for Adams in an adjacent hallway to pick her up. Adams has been recovering from a concussion from a fall last month in Ottawa.

Longtime party organizer Wally Butts expressed frustration with the situation in Oakville-North Burlington, pointing out in an email to party officials that "Dimitri is my ultimate boss."

Butts, who was close to the Conservatives' late national campaign director Doug Finley and his wife, cabinet minister Diane Finley, was let go shortly thereafter.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Liberal leader Philippe Couillard dodges language bullet

During Jean Charest's 14 years as Quebec Liberal leader, it is said he sermonized to his caucus the following piece of wisdom: the party cannot win an election on the language issue, but it can lose one on it.

In other words, it is wisest for Liberals on the campaign trail to simply stay away from language in general, since they have nothing to gain, and everything to lose.

Needless to say when Philippe Couillard, the current Liberal leader, entered last Thursday's televised debate the perceived front-runner in the campaign, his meanderings on the topic caught many inside and outside the Liberal family by surprise.

In a nutshell, Couillard suggested workers in manufacturing plants should learn English as a second language, since it would be very practical when explaining a product to prospective buyers from the U.S. or Britain.

The statement is a jaw-dropper in Quebec politics, for a couple of reasons.

First, it does not reflect official Quebec Liberal Party policy, which endorses Bill 101 (the French Language Charter).

But more importantly, the remark stabs at the very heart of the whole language debate over the last 50 years in the province. Couillard could not have come up with a more insensitive example.

Quebec's largest labour federation was quick to respond. In a communique, the FTQ draws attention to a strike at a GM car plant north of Montreal in 1970. Workers picketed for three months in order to make French the language on the shop floor instead of English.

Maîtres chez nous

In an impassioned response, the editor-in-chief of L'Actualité Carole Beaulieu wrote an open letter to Couillard. In it, she reminds Couillard of her father's support for the Liberal party back in the 1960s, when the rallying cry of "Maîtres Chez Nous" triggered the Quiet Revolution, and the end of absolute English dominance in business and on factory floors.

Beaulieu wrote that years later, when premier Robert Bourassa passed the legislation which made French the only official language in Quebec, "her father was older, his hands stained black from toiling in engine grease, yet he went out glad-handing on behalf of the Liberals."

In other words, even if the Liberals feel they can't win elections on language anymore, a large part of their base, and an important piece of the party's heritage is deeply anchored in the defence of francophones' rights to use their mother tongue at work.

Couillard recovers

Clearly Couillard is trying to appeal to francophones who are lined up to get their children into intensive English programs. And he continues to repeat that knowing a second language is an asset.

However, it is plain to see he and his Liberal handlers had a chat about how to best couch that notion.

Obligating workers to speak English on the job "would have to be justified. The job in question would have to require the knowledge of a second language," Couillard insisted in a press conference the day after the debate.

He went on to underscore a Liberal government would rigorously apply Bill 101, and work to promote and protect the French language in all spheres.

The PQ leader, Pauline Marois, continues to suggest Couillard is not prepared to lead Quebec, and has been urging him to "read up on the French Language Charter."

But for all the potential damage Couillard's remark could have caused to himself and his party, the Liberal leader seems to be coming away from this major misstep largely unscathed.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Medical marijuana: New rules and a 'ton of confusion'

Medical marijuana users across Canada can be forgiven for being confused right now.

First, they thought that with the new medical marijuana regime that comes into effect tomorrow, they would lose their ability to grow their own legal pot at home and have to buy it instead from new large-scale commercial operations.

Plus, it seemed the users would have to dismantle their own growing operations, and could find police on their doorsteps if they didn't notify Health Canada by April 30 that they had stopped production and destroyed all their plants.

'It's very confusing right now, and for people like me who are thinking about this and absorbed in it all day, it's kind of hard to keep track of what's going on.'- Dana Larsen, director of non-profit group Sensible B.C.

But a Federal Court ruling on March 21 changed the legal landscape, at least temporarily, and users licensed for personal production as of Sept. 30, 2013, will be able to keep growing their pot at home pending a future trial.

"That's a bit of a reprieve," says Lynne Belle-Isle, chair of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition.

"People that had established home gardens to cultivate cannabis had been panicking and didn't want to destroy their crops, and didn't want to get rid of their equipment and have to pay expensive prices to get it [medicinal marijuana] from commercial producers."

Even with the temporary reprieve, however, there is still much uncertainty about the new rules for users and the new private-sector commercial marijuana production industry that could be worth more than $1 billion a year by 2024.

"It's very confusing right now, and for people like me who are thinking about this and absorbed in it all day, it's kind of hard to keep track of what's going on," says Dana Larsen, a marijuana activist and director of the non-profit group Sensible B.C., which is campaigning for a provincial referendum on marijuana decriminalization in 2014.

"For an average person … there's a ton of confusion."

Here's a look at some of the issues the news rules have raised.

Physician reluctance

Under the new Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations, doctors will in effect become gatekeepers, determining who can gain access to pot legally. It's a position many are reluctant to take on.

Until now, users applied to the medical marijuana program through an application form signed by their doctor, which indicated that the physician was aware the patient was using pot for medical purposes.

Under the new rules, however, users "seek a medical document from their doctor similar to a prescription directly instead of applying through Health Canada, and so a big issue there is that the physicians are quite reluctant to sign prescriptions," says Belle-Isle.

The Canadian Medical Association has made its concerns very clear, noting in a news release earlier this month it "remains adamant that it will not throw its support behind medical use of the drug until numerous questions about safety, efficacy, dosage and delivery have been answered."

Larsen says the new requirement is a big issue, especially in rural communities where there may only be one or two doctors.

"Having doctors as the gatekeepers is not something that doctors want. And it's not something patients want because they can't find a doctor to sign off on the use of this plant, so there's still a lot of access issues around there that need to be resolved."

Questions of supply

The Health Canada website lists 12 authorized licensed commercial producers, although two weeks ago, CBC News reported that only three producers were fully up and running.

Speculation had been rampant that the licensed producers wouldn't be able to keep up with the demand from the roughly 40,000 medical marijuana users across Canada, although Belle-Isle says she's not sure what the impact of the change will be.

 "I could speculate as well and say I think it's the opposite," she says.

"With the reluctance of the physicians to sign those prescriptions, I'm not so sure there'll be a flood of new customers for these licensed commercial producers. We'll have to see how that plays out."

Some of the producers have served notice that the March 21 ruling has had no direct, immediate impact on their operations.

Marijuana Industry 20130929

CEO Chuck Rifici of Tweed Inc. looks out over the floor of the former Hershey's chocolate factory in Smiths Falls, Ont., before its transformation into the company's commercial medical marijuana operation. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

"At Tweed, it is business as usual," CEO Chuck Rifici said in blog posting on the website of the company that is transforming the former Hershey's chocolate factory in Smiths Falls, Ont., into its marijuana grow operation.

"The immediate effect of the … court decision will likely mean lower initial numbers of ... patient registrations in the short term, as many may choose to continue growing their own medicine until the issue is settled by the pending trial."

But the company is looking forward to offering increased choice to users and showing, "that we are a simple and safe alternative to growing at home," Rifici wrote.

Another supply issue Larsen notes is the fact that the companies can only sell dried marijuana buds, and not the capsules, creams, tinctures, food products, extracts and concentrates that some users favour.

"They can only sell smokeable buds, and I think that's really missing out on a lot of the medicinal value of cannabis because of that rule," says Larsen, who runs a cannabis dispensary.

Belle-Isle does see advantages, in that the commercial producers will be growing various strains of marijuana, "which is great for consumers that want options."

She also considers it a "positive thing" that there are regulations around the  commercial production.

"The quality control is there," she says. "There's a safety aspect for the user, so that's a good thing."

Questions of cost

The cost to buy a gram of marijuana from one of the commercial producers appears likely to be somewhere in line with the price on the street.

Belle-Isle expects the price will probably be in the range of $6 to $12 a gram, something that could be quite a price hike for someone who had been growing pot at home.

"I've heard recently they can grow for about 50 cents a gram, so going from 50 cents to $12 is quite a jump."

Pot Cops 20140306

Varieties of marijuana are listed at The Dispensary in Vancouver on March 6, 2014. Vancouver police have sent a message to the federal government about its new medicinal marijuana laws, saying that they are more concerned with violent drug traffickers and will take a mostly hands-off approach to the many medical pot shops in the city. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

At dispensaries in Vancouver, Larsen says, a gram typically sells for about $7 or $8.

"The thing is, we're paying prohibition prices. Our growers face the penalty of law and they have the option to sell it on the black market for similar prices as they sell  it to us."

Larsen says the price could drop substantially if large quantities can be commercially produced, a situation he acknowledges would put dispensaries like his out of business.

"But I would actually consider that a victory," he says.

"If the day comes when my dispensary can't compete because legal cannabis products are cheaper, higher quality and more accessible than we can provide, I would happily shut down and consider that a victory."


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Mounties in Dziekanski case allege witness tampering and intimidation

An RCMP constable and a former Mountie charged with perjury for their testimony at the Braidwood inquiry have lodged complaints with B.C.'s civilian police watchdog.

The complaints by Const. Gerry Rundel and retired corporal Monty Robinson mark the first time any of the officers involved in Robert Dziekanski's death in 2007 have attempted to defend themselves outside of the grindingly slow prosecutions against them.

bc-090223-ar-rcmp-dziekanski1

The four officers who were present face charges of perjury for allegedly lying during the official inquiry held into Dziekanski's death. (Paul Pritchard)

Robinson and Rundel have asked the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner (OPCC) to look into claims that Vancouver Police Department officers used "intimidation" and "leading questions" to investigate a new allegation against them.

Their complaints stem in part from details revealed by CBC News in February.

Documents showed that last September Vancouver police officers opened an investigation into a claim that all four Mounties involved in the Taser-related death of Dziekanski met secretly before testifying at the inquiry into what happened.

bc-090224-rcmp-const-gerry-rundel-tuesday1

Const. Gerry Rundell is one of four RCMP officers accused of lying during the testimony given during the public inquiry into Robert Dziekanski's death. (CBC)

At the Braidwood inquiry, which was convened to investigate how Dziekanski died after being stunned with a police Taser several times, the officers all testified they had not discussed the incident with each other.

Last August. Janice Norgard told police and the special prosecutor the four had met at her house in Richmond, B.C., in January or February 2009.

Norgard came forward after reading that one of the officers, Const. Bill Bentley, had been acquitted of perjury.  

bc-090325-taser-inquiry2

Retired corporal Benjamin Monty Robinson is shown testifying during the Braidwood inquiry. He insisted he did not compare notes with the other three RCMP officers present about what occurred the night Robert Dziekanski died. (CBC)

She alleged the 2009 meeting had been arranged by her ex-common-law partner, Brian Dietrich, who is Bentley's cousin.

But in Robinson's complaint to the OPCC, the former Mountie alleges the Vancouver police detectives who looked into Norgard's claim made multiple mistakes.

"The rules of evidence and the collection of evidence have been ignored in this case," Robinson wrote in the complaint obtained by CBC News.

Wally Oppal's involvement questioned

Robinson points out that Norgard emerged with her claim after a bitter separation battle with Dietrich ended in court. Robinson suggests the Vancouver police failed to look into that matter.

"No one requested to view or obtain separation agreements between Dietrich and Norgard," he wrote.

bc-090128-wally-oppal1

Wally Oppal was B.C.'s attorney general in 2009 during the Braidwood inquiry into the death of Robert Dziekanski. (CBC)

And Norgard didn't go straight to the authorities. She went first to Wally Oppal, an old family friend, who was also the attorney general who called for the inquiry in 2008.

Oppal then sat in on the interviews Norgard gave to the special prosecutor and police detectives.

Robinson questions why the former attorney general was allowed to be present and why Vancouver police detectives failed to challenge Oppal's involvement.

"It asks the questions of witness tampering by the former attorney general," Robinson wrote.

"The supervising officer who reviewed the file failed to open an investigation on Oppal or report his conduct to the Law Society of B.C."

Const. Rundel raised a similar concern in his separate complaint.

"These officers should not have let Oppal sit in on the interview and have an influence on their investigation, one that Oppal has a vested interest in."

"There is evidence to support misconduct and witness tampering," Rundel wrote.

Intimidation during interrogation?

Rundel is also concerned with how the police conducted their initial interview with Norgard's ex-partner, Brian Dietrich.

Several times in the recorded encounter, Insp. Laurence Rankin pressed Dietrich to confirm Norgard's story, and suggested police could go looking at Dietrich's "cellphone records, emails ... any number of things."

Although Dietrich repeatedly told the police at his door that he didn't remember any such meeting, Rankin advised him not to hold back out of "misplaced loyalty" for his cousin Bentley.   

hi-bc-130728-bill-bentley

RCMP Const. Bill Bentley was found not guilty of committing perjury at a public inquiry into the death of Robert Dziekanski, but the special prosecutor in the case is appealing that ruling. (CBC)

"You are a witness, and we don't want to see anything like that change," Rankin told him.

When Dietrich told the officers he intended to let his cousin know about the police visit, they warned him not to.

"Is there a law against it?" Dietrich asked.

Rankin suggested Dietrich could be charged with obstruction of justice.

Rundel wrote that the "officers immediately treated Dietrich as a suspect."

Norgard claims at centre of perjury trials  

Both Rundel and Robinson also complain that police failed to follow procedure when they tested Norgard's recollection of who allegedly met at her house.

Instead of asking Norgard to pick out the Mounties from a number of pictures, police presented her with just four photos of the RCMP officers.

bc-090303-kwesi-millington-tuesday2

RCMP Const. Kwesi Millington is shown testifying at the Braidwood inquiry. He is scheduled to be in court in October to face charges of perjury. (CBC)

"The interview of Janice Norgard was a leading interview," Rundel wrote, "with Wally Oppal present."

"Officers took her vague allegations as fact, while the interview of her ex-common law Brian Deitrich was more of an interrogation."

Neither Rundel nor Robinson would comment.  

Deputy Complaint Commissioner Rollie Woods said he is prohibited by law from commenting on any "complaint or to even confirm that a complaint was made unless the [commissioner] determines it is in the public interest or the matter is already in the public domain."

Vancouver police spokesman Randy Fincham told CBC News that "it would not be appropriate for us to comment on an ongoing investigation that is being conducted by the OPCC."

The special prosecutor has confirmed Norgard's allegation is behind new perjury indictments issued last month.

Robinson's trial for perjury is scheduled to begin in May.

Rundel is slated to be in court in October.

The fourth officer involved, Const. Kwesi Millington, is also scheduled to be in court in October.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Peter MacKay says Victims Bill of Rights coming within 'next few days'

A long-promised victim's bill of rights is about to be introduced in Parliament, The Canadian Press has learned.

The arrival of the legislation is bound to drive another political lightning rod into the already fractured ground in the House of Commons.

Justice Minister Peter MacKay, in a letter to the Conservative caucus on Sunday, said he looks forward to delivering on the throne speech commitment "over the next few days."

'Courtesy, compassion, inclusion and respect'

The letter was obtained by The Canadian Press and the introduction of the legislation is bound to turn up the heat with the Opposition, which has been consumed by the fight against the Harper government's proposed electoral reforms.

"As we have stated countless times, we are committed to introducing a comprehensive package of legislative reforms never before seen in our country's history," said the letter.

"Victims of crime deserve to be treated with courtesy, compassion, inclusion and respect."

It is important their rights be considered throughout the criminal justice system." MacKay, in an interview last fall, said the government's intention is to extend the involvement of victims "from the time of the offence to the final disposition of the sentence." He said the government doesn't want them to be just another Crown witness, but an effective voice.

The plan builds on other Conservative measures in what they've dubbed their "tough on crime agenda."

Ombudsman supports more rights for victims

Last year, the country's ombudsman for victims of crime recommended giving victims the right to speaking during the plea-bargaining process — something already established in some U.S.states.m

The watchdog also wants to see victims have the right to a review a decision of the Crown not to prosecute a suspect, and a right to restitution with orders that are enforceable by the courts.

"We have an opportunity with the upcoming bill of rights to rebalance the system for victims of crime in Canada", said ombudsman Sue O'Sullivan in a statement on Nov. 19, 2013.

When the proposal appeared in last fall's throne speech opening the new session of Parliament, it drew a swift response from legal advocates, notably the John Howard Society which described the notion as a return to "medieval" justice and a distraction from the real problems facing the system.

Catherine Latimer, writing in The Toronto Star, said the real crisis lies in clogged and delayed courts, as well as overcrowding in prisons and remand centres.

Critics fear return to system based on vengeance

She warned that the way the government is casting its plans, the Conservatives are threatening to "roll back more than 500 years of progress in criminal justice" by creating a system based on vengeance, the way it was in medieval Europe.

For centuries the system has worked to exorcise the notion that crime is personal affront that must be answered in a personal manner and replace it the notion that an offence against an individual is offence against society.

"The present government's plans for victim-centred justice forgets this lesson of history and threatens a slide back into a new dark age where victims' vengeance poses as justice," Latimer wrote on Oct. 27, 2013.

She pointed out, in addition to advocating for the rights of prisoners, her society also provides victims services and restorative justice programs, and it believes they should have access to trauma counselling and compensation.


21.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Peter MacKay wishes Canada's Afghan troops had been better prepared

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 30 Maret 2014 | 21.17

With Canada's mission in Afghanistan finally in the past, former defence minister Peter MacKay has acknowledged the government could have done more for its soldiers.

In a sober interview on CBC Radio's The House, MacKay said a mission as complex as Afghanistan "always causes pause for reflection."

MacKay said he wished, in some ways, that Canada had "provided more equipment, helicopters, mine-clearing equipment in the early days."

Looking back at Afghanistan

CBC News Network's Power & Politics and CBC Radio's The House will look back at Canada's mission in Afghanistan and whether it was a success.

Listen to The House's special edition on Afghanistan March 29 at 9 a.m. on CBC Radio One and SiriusXM channel 169.

Watch and take part in Power & Politics' special town hall edition on Canada's mission in Afghanistan on March 31, starting at 5 p.m. ET on CBC News Network.

"I don't think the ferocity of the mission perhaps dawned on even military leaders, let alone political leaders of two different governments," he said.

"In retrospect, we could have perhaps prepared our soldiers better through both equipment and training."

For Canada, the war in Afghanistan cost the lives of 158 soldiers, one diplomat, one journalist and two civilian contractors.

But the losses weren't confined to the borders of Afghanistan.

Soldiers returning home faced harrowing personal battles. The recent spate of suicides of Afghan vets created a national sense of urgency about post-traumatic stress disorder and many Canadians, including federal opposition parties, are demanding better care for Canada's military personnel.

Former chief of defence staff Rick Hillier is among them.

In December, he said the suicides were a tragic and needless loss of life, saying "young men and women have lost confidence in our country to support them" and called for a public board of inquiry into the Canadian Forces' handling of mental health issues.

It's also something that weighs on MacKay's mind. 

"I wish we could have, perhaps, been able to reach out into our country's mental health providers to enlist their support that's needed now," MacKay said.

Creating a 'security umbrella'

But the cabinet minister also noted the government has made ambitious efforts to do that, including doubling the complement of mental health professionals and setting up joint personnel support units.

"We have 20-year-old veterans in this country that are battle-hardened, that are combat veterans, this is something we haven't seen in a generation. And that has been a shock to the country's collective system."

More than 40,000 Canadian Forces members have been deployed to Afghanistan since October 2001. 

Military operations wrapped up in 2011 and Canadian efforts were dedicated to training Afghan soldiers, along with peace-building and humanitarian development. 

Creating that security umbrella, MacKay said, is the root of Canada's participation in Afghanistan.

"That's perhaps the biggest challenge … the lack of governance and the undeniable corruption," he said, adding that Canada will continue to support front-line agencies and government departments in the country. 

The last group of Canadian soldiers involved in the NATO training mission were welcomed home on March 18, at a ceremony where Prime Minister Stephen Harper designated May 9 as a national day of honour to commemorate Canada's mission in Afghanistan.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Federal budget bill loaded with unrelated measures, critics say

The latest Conservative omnibus bill weighs in at 359 pages and alters everything from the food and rail safety regimes to the Judges Act, the National Defence Act and the handling of temporary foreign workers.

In all, almost 40 different pieces of legislation are being altered by the single bill tabled Friday.

The government says it is designed to enact measures in last month's federal budget, and has christened the effort the "Harper Government Creating Jobs & Growth While Returning to Balanced Budgets With Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 1."

The official Opposition NDP simply calls it a "monster."

The legislation, as budget implementation bills are supposed to do, puts in place the legislative machinery to make good on a number of budgetary measures.

These include benefits such as a tax credit for search and rescue volunteers, an increase in eligible adoption expenses for tax purposes, raising tobacco taxes and eliminating the need for individual tax filers to claim a GST tax rebate — which will now be calculated automatically by the Canada Revenue Agency.

"Under the leadership of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, our government has never strayed from our commitment to strengthen the economy for all Canadians, and never wavered from seeing our plan through," Finance Minister Joe Oliver said in a release.

But, as has become routine with the Harper government, the latest budget bill is stuffed with non-budget-related measures as well.

Trademarks, hazardous goods, hospital parking

"I think there are over 300 pages, 30 sections, all sorts of disparate things — food safety, rail safety, judges, even military ranks — that have nothing to do with the budget," complained Liberal critic John McCallum.

The bill includes provisions to impose fines against companies that abuse the temporary foreign workers program.

It has more than 50 pages of changes to the Trademarks Act.

It harmonizes hazardous goods rules with the United States, precludes three senators from the parliamentary pension plan while under suspension and even gives cabinet a say on regulations regarding fresh fruits and vegetables.

NDP finance critic Nathan Cullen could not contain his exasperation, noting there are actually items in the bill his party supports — such as a reversal on imposing GST on hospital parking and some of the targeted tax credits.

It's all that other unrelated stuff that drives opposition MPs wild.

"Our past experience has taught us that the devil lies in the details," he said.

Harper himself, as a young opposition MP, once eloquently critiqued Liberal omnibus legislation because of the dilemma it posed for parliamentarians trying to do their job responsibly.

As the young Harper implored in 1995, "In the interest of democracy I ask: How can members represent their constituents on these various areas when they are forced to vote in a block on such legislation and on such concerns?"

"We can agree with some of the measures but oppose others. How do we express our views and the views of our constituents when the matters are so diverse?"

Peter Van Loan

Government House Leader Peter Van Loan on Friday tabled the federal government's budget implementation bill on behalf of Finance Minister Joe Oliver. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

The Liberal omnibus bill that drew Harper's ire in 1995 was 21 pages in length and altered 11 existing pieces of legislation.

In recent years, the Conservatives have used omnibus budget bills to alter everything from the Environmental Assessment Act to the Fisheries Act and the immigration law.

Controversial U.S. tax power

The most recent one was rushed through the Commons in October, and included a measure that changed how Supreme Court justices are appointed. The top court responded last week that such a change required a constitutional amendment, and was thus beyond Parliament's power.

The bill tabled Friday includes an entirely new piece of legislation — a controversial bill that requires Canadian banks to report the financial holdings of dual Canadian-U.S. citizens, with the information ultimately going to the American tax man.

The U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act raises significant privacy concerns for as many as one million Canadians and may face a court challenge.

That's just one clear example of a legislative change in the budget bill that should be in stand-alone legislation for parliamentarians to properly debate, Cullen said.

There are also proposed measures aimed at ensuring that disgraced senators Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau do not accrue pensionable service while they are suspended from the upper chamber.

Mobile users, read the live blog recap here.

Mobile users, read Bill C-31


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Residential school survivors notified of possible privacy breach

Residential school survivors have been notified of a possible breach of privacy by the agency handling their compensation claims, says Justice Murray Sinclair, the chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

"The survivors who are affected, or believe they have been affected by it because they have been notified of which files were on the computer — they have contacted us," Sinclair said in an interview with CBC News Network's Power & Politics on Friday.

CBC News reported on Thursday that Canada's privacy watchdog has been asked to look into a possible breach of personal information belonging to residential school survivors, after an adjudicator working for the agency handling their compensation claims filed a police report citing blackmail.

'That causes concern among survivors because they were promised confidentiality when they were interviewed.'—Justice Murray Sinclair, chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

The Indian Residential Schools Adjudication Secretariat is the administrative body that manages the claims made by residential school survivors.

Survivors can seek compensation for abuse they have suffered in residential schools through an independent assessment process (IAP) managed by the agency.

"They have spoken to us about their concerns and what we have committed to them to do is to follow up with the investigation officials as well as the IAP officials, just to determine what steps are going to be taken to protect the privacy issues that they're raising with us," Sinclair told guest host Rosemary Barton.

Sinclair said it was his understanding that the personal information included medical records and case summaries detailing the abuse the survivors endured.

"Medical records are inherently private. But in addition to that, it would probably include residential school experiences and other related matters to that."

"That causes concern among survivors because they were promised confidentiality when they were interviewed by the IAP staff," Sinclair said.

"And to now think that confidentiality may have been meaningless if the documents are in the hands of other people would be a grave concern to them emotionally."

Privacy watchdog asked to investigate

NDP MP Charlie Angus, who represents a northern Ontario riding where a residential school once operated, asked the Office of the Privacy Commissioner to investigate the matter in a letter dated March 27.

"I respectfully request that you undertake an investigation of this data breach, how and when it occurred, and the practices of both the IAP and Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada in responding to this breach — and make recommendations as to how their practices can be improved," Angus said in his letter to the interim federal privacy commissioner Chantal Bernier.

Angus also wrote a second letter to Daniel Shapiro, the chief adjudicator at the Indian Residential Schools Adjudication Secretariat, asking him to make public the details of the incident.

'It is important to reassure the survivors and the public that every measure was taken and is taken to address this potentially damaging breach.'— Charlie Angus, NDP MP

"I have no desire to point the finger at any individual employee," Angus said in the letter to Shapiro.

"However, the larger issue of protocols for protecting personal data must be considered of paramount importance. It is important to reassure the survivors and the public that every measure was taken and is taken to address this potentially damaging breach."

A spokesperson for Shapiro told CBC News on Wednesday that "an individual contacted the secretariat earlier this month" claiming to have information relating to claims made by residential school survivors.

"The adjudicator has made a report to the police, and indicated that blackmail was involved," Michael Tansey, a senior communications officer with the agency, said in an email to CBC News.

He also said the agency had yet to determine whether the individual who contacted them actually possessed any confidential information or was bluffing.

Tansey said the secretariat informed the Department of Aboriginal Affairs "shortly after" the agency became aware of it, and that it referred the matter to the privacy watchdog "this week."

The office for the federal privacy commissioner confirmed to CBC News on Wednesday that the matter had been reported to it by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs on Monday.

It is unclear how much time elapsed between the time that the incident occurred "earlier this month," as Tansey said and last Monday, when the matter was referred to the privacy watchdog. 

Who is responsible?

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt said on Tuesday that the secretariat is an independent organization for which his department "is not responsible."

But Angus, who believes the claims process does fall under the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, has asked the privacy watchdog to clarify who would be responsible for the data which may have been lost or stolen.

This is not the first time there has been a possible privacy breach of personal information belonging to residential school survivors.

The office of the privacy commissioner said it was notified of a separate incident in 2013, while the agency said a possible breach was identified in 2012.

It is unclear whether those two incidents are related to this month's event.

The secretariat is an independent, quasi-judicial tribunal established in 2007 under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement.

Sinclair said he did not have any more information on the incident other than what the residential school survivors told him. "Even if we had an opportunity to ask questions about it, we would probably respect the investigation that is now ongoing and not pursue it at this point."

Sinclair was in Edmonton for the final hearings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

The commission will have to submit a final report by June 30, 2015, when its mandate comes to an end.

Mobile users, read the Angus letters here and here.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Mark Carney pushed for Hadfield uplink for $5 note unveil

Remember the Bank of Canada's unveiling event for the $5 and $10 polymer bank notes? The one where Canada's first commander of the International Space Station, Chris Hadfield, was beamed in live — floating $5 note and all?

New documents obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act reveal the decision to beam Hadfield in came from the very top of the Bank of Canada chain of command — then-governor Mark Carney himself. Carney was in his final months in the role before heading off to take the helm of the Bank of England.

"In recent conversations with the governor, he said that he would like to have Chris Hadfield's participation at the event. I believe you are of the same opinion," communications chief Jill Vardy wrote in an email dated Feb. 26, 2013.

"Remember that Hadfield has a $5 note in space and will be taping a short segment for us that was to be used for the issue event (not the unveil)."

At this point in time, both Hadfield and the new $5 note, which carries a depiction of the Canadarm2, was already circling the Earth onboard the ISS. According to email correspondence among Bank of Canada staff, the original plan was to air a taped video of Hadfield during the issue ceremony in Ottawa, scheduled for fall 2013. 

New Money 20131107

Astronaut Chris Hadfield, left, presents Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz with the $5 bill he took into space at a ceremony to officially issue the new $5 polymer note, which features the robotic Canadarm2 and Dextre on Nov. 7, 2013, in Longueuil, Que. (Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press)

The April unveiling event — only a few months away as of the February email — was meant to be "low-key, in a local school or the Garden Court, with the governor and minister of finance only."

A responding email sent on the same day agreed to explore the suggestion.

A communications staff member said he liked the Hadfield ideas and had raised the live feed idea with a co-worker "the week before last, who advised it was impossible."

"If something has changed, then we should try this or the taping. Either seems like a very topical approach given all the exposure Hadfield has been getting," reads the email. 

A meeting between senior staff and Carney was then arranged for March 6. 

On March 7, an internal Canadian Space Agency email, contained within another set of documents CBC News previously reported on, shows the change of plans.

"The [Bank of Canada] VIP really wants a LIVE event with Chris," the note read. 

There was brief consideration of the potential risk involved with the satellite downlink, due to a spacecraft launch to the ISS that was taking place around the same time. But five days later, the space agency appeared to have worked out the kinks.

Along with the possibility of a space debut, Bank of Canada staff floated the idea of having the CEO of Via Rail debut the $10 bill from a train (the bill features a Via Rail train journeying through the Rocky Mountains). That idea ultimately wasn't picked up. 

'Journalists' questions not wanted

The documents also reveal that promotional planning for the $5 and $10 polymer notes began even earlier than the February 2012 mark last reported.

An internally sent email dated Aug. 12, 2011, from a Bank of Canada staff member said he received a call from a Canadian Space Agency employee Fabienne Lebranchu.

"She's calling because she's heard that the new $5 note will feature the Canadarm on it. She said Chris Hatfield [sic] will go on a space mission in 2012 and she would like to see if there's any way he could bring the new note (or a prototype, if it's not available yet) with him on the mission," reads the email.

Canadian Space Agency spokesperson Julie Simard told CBC News that Lebranchu was not the originator of the idea, but was merely co-ordinating with the bank to take care of "the logistic behind the official flying kits." 

"What is not reflected in the documents you have, are the discussions and meetings that took place in both organizations prior to that specific phone call," Simard said in an email. 

At any rate, the nearly two years' worth of planning culminated in a highly scripted unveiling, which went off mostly without a hitch, save for then-finance minister Jim Flaherty finishing his speech early and having to bide time before the link with Hadfield went live. The event also included three contingency plans in case the satellite link went awry. 

The planning was so carefully planned, in fact, that Bank of Canada communications staff caught one big no-no in a draft of the script for the event photo-op.

"Please don't use the word 'photojournalists' as is in the script. Say something like 'photographers and videographers are now invited to a photo op (details here)... a reminder that this is a photo op only — the minister and governor will not be taking media questions during the photo op,'" reads an email.

"It won't stop reporters from asking but it will at least draw the line. Jeremy and Kathleen will both be there and can give you the signal to shorten the photo op if it gets too unruly."

Live broadcast 'even better than pre-recorded clip'

When reached for comment, Carney's current spokesperson at the Bank of England directed CBC News to the Bank of Canada, which confirmed Carney's intervention in the plans.

"The governor and other senior officials felt the event would be more appealing to media if Commander Hadfield unveiled the note from space while he was there," spokesperson Alexandre Deslongchamps wrote in an email to CBC News.

"This presented a unique and unprecedented opportunity to showcase Canada's contributions to space exploration. Following that line of thinking, it became clear that having a live broadcast from space — were it possible — would be even better than a pre-recorded clip."

Deslongchamps noted that a pre-recorded clip "wouldn't have attracted the same media attention, even if it would still be innovative."

He said the goal was to maximize media coverage in a cost-effective way. As CBC News reported in January, the live feed from the International Space Station alone cost just over $9,000.

"The Bank of Canada was able to create a compelling event for media and Canadians in general, thereby reaching its goals."


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Do you have the right ID to cast a ballot in a federal election?

Much of the debate over the government's proposed changes to Canadian election laws has focused on its plan to eliminate vouching, a process that lets those without proper identification have someone else in the same polling division swear to their name and address.

Approved ID for federal votes

  • Driver's licence
  • Ontario health card
  • Provincial/territorial ID card in some provinces/territories 
  • Canadian passport
  • Certificate of Canadian citizenship (citizenship card)
  • Birth certificate
  • Certificate of Indian status (status card)
  • Social insurance number card
  • Old age security card
  • Student ID card
  • Liquor ID card
  • Hospital/medical clinic card
  • Credit/debit card
  • Employee card
  • Public transportation card
  • Library card
  • Canadian Forces ID card
  • Veterans Affairs Canada health card
  • Canadian Blood Services/Héma-Québec card
  • CNIB ID card
  • Firearm possession and acquisition licence or possession only licence
  • Fishing, trapping or hunting licence
  • Outdoors or wildlife card/licence
  • Hospital bracelet worn by residents of long-term care facilities
  • Parolee ID card
  • Utility bill (telephone, TV, PUC, hydro, gas or water)
  • Bank/credit card statement
  • Vehicle ownership/insurance
  • Correspondence issued by a school, college or university
  • Statement of government benefits (employment insurance, old age security, social assistance, disability support or child tax benefit)
  • Attestation of residence issued by the responsible authority of a First Nations band or reserve
  • Government cheque or cheque stub
  • Pension plan statement of benefits, contributions or participation
  • Residential lease/mortgage statement
  • Income/property tax assessment notice
  • Insurance policy
  • Letter from a public curator, public guardian or public trustee
  • One of the following, issued by the responsible authority of a shelter, soup kitchen, student/senior residence, or long-term care facility: attestation of residence, letter of stay, admission form or statement of benefits

A less-discussed change proposed in Bill C-23 would also roll back a pilot program that allowed 400,000 people to use their voter information card as proof of address in the 2011 election.

Those who work to promote democracy — the current and former heads of Elections Canada, along with other experts — say removing those options would essentially deny the vote to tens of thousands of people. Harry Neufeld, who studied problems in the 2011 campaign, says 520,000 people could lose their right to vote.

The Conservatives say there are 39 forms of ID that let people prove their name and address when they vote in a federal election, arguing that's enough to get rid of vouching and the use of the voter information cards as proof of address.

But how easy is it to prove you are who you say you are when you cast a ballot?

The experts who so far have appeared before the procedure and House affairs committee have raised concerns about the list provided by Elections Canada, and defended by Pierre Poilievre, minister of state for democratic reform.

The biggest catch seems to be the need for voters to prove where they live. Take away the driver's licence, and it gets complicated.

Here are three things to know about the way Bill C-23 would change how Canadians could identify themselves to cast ballots in federal elections.

1. Few pieces of ID list address

Voters don't just prove their identity to cast a ballot: they have to prove where they live too. And while Elections Canada says 85 per cent of Canadians have a driver's licence — based on the numbers they get from provincial licensing offices — that penetration drops in urban areas like Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal, where better public transit systems mean fewer people require cars to get around. 

One of the democracy experts appearing before the committee Thursday made that point. Student Vote's Taylor Gunn, who lives in Toronto, told the committee that he doesn't have a driver's licence.

"My health card, embarrassingly enough, is my only piece of official ID and it doesn't have my address on it. My wife couldn't vouch for me right now [under Bill C-23]," Gunn said.

Government issued ID like social insurance number cards and birth certificates do not show an address. Canadian passports allow people to write in their own address, so can't be used as proof of residence.

2. Originals required

No driver's licence? No problem. Poilievre told MPs in question period Friday that photo ID and government-issued ID aren't required. His critics, however, say it's not that easy.

The list of accepted identification includes "things like utility bills, [Old Age Security] or Employment Insurance cheques, statement of attestation from aboriginal reserve, Indian status card, a student card, the list goes on and on. It's 39 different options. We just think it's reasonable that people bring some form of ID when they show up to vote," Poilievre said.

The list also includes bank statements and insurance policies. Unless, that is, the documents are delivered by email. A printed version of emailed documents won't suffice. Instead, voters would have to go to the bank or the hydro or insurance company — or dig through their paper files at home — to find an original copy. And they'll have to know that before they head to the polling station to cast a ballot on the advance polling day or election day.

3. Other options

For those who don't have a driver's licence, they could present a lease or have a letter of attestation from a shelter, soup kitchen, student or senior residence, or long-term care facility. But that requires more planning than simply heading to the polling station on election day.

Neufeld, the former chief electoral officer in British Columbia and now a consultant, says if the government is worried about vouching, there are ways to make it more secure.

There are problems, he says, including rushed poll clerks not keeping detailed records of who is vouching, or for whom they are vouching.

He said he likes a method used in Manitoba elections.

"If they have two pieces of ID but neither of them definitively proves their residential address, then they have to sign a declaration that the address they're claiming to live at is indeed their address," Neufeld said Thursday after speaking to MPs.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Federal budget bill loaded with unrelated measures, critics say

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 29 Maret 2014 | 21.17

The latest Conservative omnibus bill weighs in at 359 pages and alters everything from the food and rail safety regimes to the Judges Act, the National Defence Act and the handling of temporary foreign workers.

In all, almost 40 different pieces of legislation are being altered by the single bill tabled Friday.

The government says it is designed to enact measures in last month's federal budget, and has christened the effort the "Harper Government Creating Jobs & Growth While Returning to Balanced Budgets With Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 1."

The official Opposition NDP simply calls it a "monster."

The legislation, as budget implementation bills are supposed to do, puts in place the legislative machinery to make good on a number of budgetary measures.

These include benefits such as a tax credit for search and rescue volunteers, an increase in eligible adoption expenses for tax purposes, raising tobacco taxes and eliminating the need for individual tax filers to claim a GST tax rebate — which will now be calculated automatically by the Canada Revenue Agency.

"Under the leadership of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, our government has never strayed from our commitment to strengthen the economy for all Canadians, and never wavered from seeing our plan through," Finance Minister Joe Oliver said in a release.

But, as has become routine with the Harper government, the latest budget bill is stuffed with non-budget-related measures as well.

Trademarks, hazardous goods, hospital parking

"I think there are over 300 pages, 30 sections, all sorts of disparate things — food safety, rail safety, judges, even military ranks — that have nothing to do with the budget," complained Liberal critic John McCallum.

The bill includes provisions to impose fines against companies that abuse the temporary foreign workers program.

It has more than 50 pages of changes to the Trademarks Act.

It harmonizes hazardous goods rules with the United States, precludes three senators from the parliamentary pension plan while under suspension and even gives cabinet a say on regulations regarding fresh fruits and vegetables.

NDP finance critic Nathan Cullen could not contain his exasperation, noting there are actually items in the bill his party supports — such as a reversal on imposing GST on hospital parking and some of the targeted tax credits.

It's all that other unrelated stuff that drives opposition MPs wild.

"Our past experience has taught us that the devil lies in the details," he said.

Harper himself, as a young opposition MP, once eloquently critiqued Liberal omnibus legislation because of the dilemma it posed for parliamentarians trying to do their job responsibly.

As the young Harper implored in 1995, "In the interest of democracy I ask: How can members represent their constituents on these various areas when they are forced to vote in a block on such legislation and on such concerns?"

"We can agree with some of the measures but oppose others. How do we express our views and the views of our constituents when the matters are so diverse?"

Peter Van Loan

Government House Leader Peter Van Loan on Friday tabled the federal government's budget implementation bill on behalf of Finance Minister Joe Oliver. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

The Liberal omnibus bill that drew Harper's ire in 1995 was 21 pages in length and altered 11 existing pieces of legislation.

In recent years, the Conservatives have used omnibus budget bills to alter everything from the Environmental Assessment Act to the Fisheries Act and the immigration law.

Controversial U.S. tax power

The most recent one was rushed through the Commons in October, and included a measure that changed how Supreme Court justices are appointed. The top court responded last week that such a change required a constitutional amendment, and was thus beyond Parliament's power.

The bill tabled Friday includes an entirely new piece of legislation — a controversial bill that requires Canadian banks to report the financial holdings of dual Canadian-U.S. citizens, with the information ultimately going to the American tax man.

The U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act raises significant privacy concerns for as many as one million Canadians and may face a court challenge.

That's just one clear example of a legislative change in the budget bill that should be in stand-alone legislation for parliamentarians to properly debate, Cullen said.

There are also proposed measures aimed at ensuring that disgraced senators Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau do not accrue pensionable service while they are suspended from the upper chamber.

Mobile users, read the live blog recap here.

Mobile users, read Bill C-31


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Residential school survivors notified of possible privacy breach

Residential school survivors have been notified of a possible breach of privacy by the agency handling their compensation claims, says Justice Murray Sinclair, the chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

"The survivors who are affected, or believe they have been affected by it because they have been notified of which files were on the computer — they have contacted us," Sinclair said in an interview with CBC News Network's Power & Politics on Friday.

CBC News reported on Thursday that Canada's privacy watchdog has been asked to look into a possible breach of personal information belonging to residential school survivors, after an adjudicator working for the agency handling their compensation claims filed a police report citing blackmail.

'That causes concern among survivors because they were promised confidentiality when they were interviewed.'—Justice Murray Sinclair, chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

The Indian Residential Schools Adjudication Secretariat is the administrative body that manages the claims made by residential school survivors.

Survivors can seek compensation for abuse they have suffered in residential schools through an independent assessment process (IAP) managed by the agency.

"They have spoken to us about their concerns and what we have committed to them to do is to follow up with the investigation officials as well as the IAP officials, just to determine what steps are going to be taken to protect the privacy issues that they're raising with us," Sinclair told guest host Rosemary Barton.

Sinclair said it was his understanding that the personal information included medical records and case summaries detailing the abuse the survivors endured.

"Medical records are inherently private. But in addition to that, it would probably include residential school experiences and other related matters to that."

"That causes concern among survivors because they were promised confidentiality when they were interviewed by the IAP staff," Sinclair said.

"And to now think that confidentiality may have been meaningless if the documents are in the hands of other people would be a grave concern to them emotionally."

Privacy watchdog asked to investigate

NDP MP Charlie Angus, who represents a northern Ontario riding where a residential school once operated, asked the Office of the Privacy Commissioner to investigate the matter in a letter dated March 27.

"I respectfully request that you undertake an investigation of this data breach, how and when it occurred, and the practices of both the IAP and Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada in responding to this breach — and make recommendations as to how their practices can be improved," Angus said in his letter to the interim federal privacy commissioner Chantal Bernier.

Angus also wrote a second letter to Daniel Shapiro, the chief adjudicator at the Indian Residential Schools Adjudication Secretariat, asking him to make public the details of the incident.

'It is important to reassure the survivors and the public that every measure was taken and is taken to address this potentially damaging breach.'— Charlie Angus, NDP MP

"I have no desire to point the finger at any individual employee," Angus said in the letter to Shapiro.

"However, the larger issue of protocols for protecting personal data must be considered of paramount importance. It is important to reassure the survivors and the public that every measure was taken and is taken to address this potentially damaging breach."

A spokesperson for Shapiro told CBC News on Wednesday that "an individual contacted the secretariat earlier this month" claiming to have information relating to claims made by residential school survivors.

"The adjudicator has made a report to the police, and indicated that blackmail was involved," Michael Tansey, a senior communications officer with the agency, said in an email to CBC News.

He also said the agency had yet to determine whether the individual who contacted them actually possessed any confidential information or was bluffing.

Tansey said the secretariat informed the Department of Aboriginal Affairs "shortly after" the agency became aware of it, and that it referred the matter to the privacy watchdog "this week."

The office for the federal privacy commissioner confirmed to CBC News on Wednesday that the matter had been reported to it by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs on Monday.

It is unclear how much time elapsed between the time that the incident occurred "earlier this month," as Tansey said and last Monday, when the matter was referred to the privacy watchdog. 

Who is responsible?

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt said on Tuesday that the secretariat is an independent organization for which his department "is not responsible."

But Angus, who believes the claims process does fall under the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, has asked the privacy watchdog to clarify who would be responsible for the data which may have been lost or stolen.

This is not the first time there has been a possible privacy breach of personal information belonging to residential school survivors.

The office of the privacy commissioner said it was notified of a separate incident in 2013, while the agency said a possible breach was identified in 2012.

It is unclear whether those two incidents are related to this month's event.

The secretariat is an independent, quasi-judicial tribunal established in 2007 under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement.

Sinclair said he did not have any more information on the incident other than what the residential school survivors told him. "Even if we had an opportunity to ask questions about it, we would probably respect the investigation that is now ongoing and not pursue it at this point."

Sinclair was in Edmonton for the final hearings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

The commission will have to submit a final report by June 30, 2015, when its mandate comes to an end.

Mobile users, read the Angus letters here and here.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Mark Carney pushed for Hadfield uplink for $5 note unveil

Remember the Bank of Canada's unveiling event for the $5 and $10 polymer bank notes? The one where Canada's first commander of the International Space Station, Chris Hadfield, was beamed in live — floating $5 note and all?

New documents obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act reveal the decision to beam Hadfield in came from the very top of the Bank of Canada chain of command — then-governor Mark Carney himself. Carney was in his final months in the role before heading off to take the helm of the Bank of England.

"In recent conversations with the governor, he said that he would like to have Chris Hadfield's participation at the event. I believe you are of the same opinion," communications chief Jill Vardy wrote in an email dated Feb. 26, 2013.

"Remember that Hadfield has a $5 note in space and will be taping a short segment for us that was to be used for the issue event (not the unveil)."

At this point in time, both Hadfield and the new $5 note, which carries a depiction of the Canadarm2, was already circling the Earth onboard the ISS. According to email correspondence among Bank of Canada staff, the original plan was to air a taped video of Hadfield during the issue ceremony in Ottawa, scheduled for fall 2013. 

New Money 20131107

Astronaut Chris Hadfield, left, presents Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz with the $5 bill he took into space at a ceremony to officially issue the new $5 polymer note, which features the robotic Canadarm2 and Dextre on Nov. 7, 2013, in Longueuil, Que. (Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press)

The April unveiling event — only a few months away as of the February email — was meant to be "low-key, in a local school or the Garden Court, with the governor and minister of finance only."

A responding email sent on the same day agreed to explore the suggestion.

A communications staff member said he liked the Hadfield ideas and had raised the live feed idea with a co-worker "the week before last, who advised it was impossible."

"If something has changed, then we should try this or the taping. Either seems like a very topical approach given all the exposure Hadfield has been getting," reads the email. 

A meeting between senior staff and Carney was then arranged for March 6. 

On March 7, an internal Canadian Space Agency email, contained within another set of documents CBC News previously reported on, shows the change of plans.

"The [Bank of Canada] VIP really wants a LIVE event with Chris," the note read. 

There was brief consideration of the potential risk involved with the satellite downlink, due to a spacecraft launch to the ISS that was taking place around the same time. But five days later, the space agency appeared to have worked out the kinks.

Along with the possibility of a space debut, Bank of Canada staff floated the idea of having the CEO of Via Rail debut the $10 bill from a train (the bill features a Via Rail train journeying through the Rocky Mountains). That idea ultimately wasn't picked up. 

'Journalists' questions not wanted

The documents also reveal that promotional planning for the $5 and $10 polymer notes began even earlier than the February 2012 mark last reported.

An internally sent email dated Aug. 12, 2011, from a Bank of Canada staff member said he received a call from a Canadian Space Agency employee Fabienne Lebranchu.

"She's calling because she's heard that the new $5 note will feature the Canadarm on it. She said Chris Hatfield [sic] will go on a space mission in 2012 and she would like to see if there's any way he could bring the new note (or a prototype, if it's not available yet) with him on the mission," reads the email.

Canadian Space Agency spokesperson Julie Simard told CBC News that Lebranchu was not the originator of the idea, but was merely co-ordinating with the bank to take care of "the logistic behind the official flying kits." 

"What is not reflected in the documents you have, are the discussions and meetings that took place in both organizations prior to that specific phone call," Simard said in an email. 

At any rate, the nearly two years' worth of planning culminated in a highly scripted unveiling, which went off mostly without a hitch, save for then-finance minister Jim Flaherty finishing his speech early and having to bide time before the link with Hadfield went live. The event also included three contingency plans in case the satellite link went awry. 

The planning was so carefully planned, in fact, that Bank of Canada communications staff caught one big no-no in a draft of the script for the event photo-op.

"Please don't use the word 'photojournalists' as is in the script. Say something like 'photographers and videographers are now invited to a photo op (details here)... a reminder that this is a photo op only — the minister and governor will not be taking media questions during the photo op,'" reads an email.

"It won't stop reporters from asking but it will at least draw the line. Jeremy and Kathleen will both be there and can give you the signal to shorten the photo op if it gets too unruly."

Live broadcast 'even better than pre-recorded clip'

When reached for comment, Carney's current spokesperson at the Bank of England directed CBC News to the Bank of Canada, which confirmed Carney's intervention in the plans.

"The governor and other senior officials felt the event would be more appealing to media if Commander Hadfield unveiled the note from space while he was there," spokesperson Alexandre Deslongchamps wrote in an email to CBC News.

"This presented a unique and unprecedented opportunity to showcase Canada's contributions to space exploration. Following that line of thinking, it became clear that having a live broadcast from space — were it possible — would be even better than a pre-recorded clip."

Deslongchamps noted that a pre-recorded clip "wouldn't have attracted the same media attention, even if it would still be innovative."

He said the goal was to maximize media coverage in a cost-effective way. As CBC News reported in January, the live feed from the International Space Station alone cost just over $9,000.

"The Bank of Canada was able to create a compelling event for media and Canadians in general, thereby reaching its goals."


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Peter MacKay wishes Canada's Afghan troops had been better prepared

With Canada's mission in Afghanistan finally in the past, former defence minister Peter MacKay has acknowledged the government could have done more for its soldiers.

In a sober interview on CBC Radio's The House, MacKay said a mission as complex as Afghanistan "always causes pause for reflection."

MacKay said he wished, in some ways, that Canada had "provided more equipment, helicopters, mine-clearing equipment in the early days."

Looking back at Afghanistan

CBC News Network's Power & Politics and CBC Radio's The House will look back at Canada's mission in Afghanistan and whether it was a success.

Listen to The House's special edition on Afghanistan March 29 at 9 a.m. on CBC Radio One and SiriusXM channel 169.

Watch and take part in Power & Politics' special town hall edition on Canada's mission in Afghanistan on March 31, starting at 5 p.m. ET on CBC News Network.

"I don't think the ferocity of the mission perhaps dawned on even military leaders, let alone political leaders of two different governments," he said.

"In retrospect, we could have perhaps prepared our soldiers better through both equipment and training."

For Canada, the war in Afghanistan cost the lives of 158 soldiers, one diplomat, one journalist and two civilian contractors.

But the losses weren't confined to the borders of Afghanistan.

Soldiers returning home faced harrowing personal battles. The recent spate of suicides of Afghan vets created a national sense of urgency about post-traumatic stress disorder and many Canadians, including federal opposition parties, are demanding better care for Canada's military personnel.

Former chief of defence staff Rick Hillier is among them.

In December, he said the suicides were a tragic and needless loss of life, saying "young men and women have lost confidence in our country to support them" and called for a public board of inquiry into the Canadian Forces' handling of mental health issues.

It's also something that weighs on MacKay's mind. 

"I wish we could have, perhaps, been able to reach out into our country's mental health providers to enlist their support that's needed now," MacKay said.

Creating a 'security umbrella'

But the cabinet minister also noted the government has made ambitious efforts to do that, including doubling the complement of mental health professionals and setting up joint personnel support units.

"We have 20-year-old veterans in this country that are battle-hardened, that are combat veterans, this is something we haven't seen in a generation. And that has been a shock to the country's collective system."

More than 40,000 Canadian Forces members have been deployed to Afghanistan since October 2001. 

Military operations wrapped up in 2011 and Canadian efforts were dedicated to training Afghan soldiers, along with peace-building and humanitarian development. 

Creating that security umbrella, MacKay said, is the root of Canada's participation in Afghanistan.

"That's perhaps the biggest challenge … the lack of governance and the undeniable corruption," he said, adding that Canada will continue to support front-line agencies and government departments in the country. 

The last group of Canadian soldiers involved in the NATO training mission were welcomed home on March 18, at a ceremony where Prime Minister Stephen Harper designated May 9 as a national day of honour to commemorate Canada's mission in Afghanistan.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Do you have the right ID to cast a ballot in a federal election?

Much of the debate over the government's proposed changes to Canadian election laws has focused on its plan to eliminate vouching, a process that lets those without proper identification have someone else in the same polling division swear to their name and address.

Approved ID for federal votes

  • Driver's licence
  • Ontario health card
  • Provincial/territorial ID card in some provinces/territories 
  • Canadian passport
  • Certificate of Canadian citizenship (citizenship card)
  • Birth certificate
  • Certificate of Indian status (status card)
  • Social insurance number card
  • Old age security card
  • Student ID card
  • Liquor ID card
  • Hospital/medical clinic card
  • Credit/debit card
  • Employee card
  • Public transportation card
  • Library card
  • Canadian Forces ID card
  • Veterans Affairs Canada health card
  • Canadian Blood Services/Héma-Québec card
  • CNIB ID card
  • Firearm possession and acquisition licence or possession only licence
  • Fishing, trapping or hunting licence
  • Outdoors or wildlife card/licence
  • Hospital bracelet worn by residents of long-term care facilities
  • Parolee ID card
  • Utility bill (telephone, TV, PUC, hydro, gas or water)
  • Bank/credit card statement
  • Vehicle ownership/insurance
  • Correspondence issued by a school, college or university
  • Statement of government benefits (employment insurance, old age security, social assistance, disability support or child tax benefit)
  • Attestation of residence issued by the responsible authority of a First Nations band or reserve
  • Government cheque or cheque stub
  • Pension plan statement of benefits, contributions or participation
  • Residential lease/mortgage statement
  • Income/property tax assessment notice
  • Insurance policy
  • Letter from a public curator, public guardian or public trustee
  • One of the following, issued by the responsible authority of a shelter, soup kitchen, student/senior residence, or long-term care facility: attestation of residence, letter of stay, admission form or statement of benefits

A less-discussed change proposed in Bill C-23 would also roll back a pilot program that allowed 400,000 people to use their voter information card as proof of address in the 2011 election.

Those who work to promote democracy — the current and former heads of Elections Canada, along with other experts — say removing those options would essentially deny the vote to tens of thousands of people. Harry Neufeld, who studied problems in the 2011 campaign, says 520,000 people could lose their right to vote.

The Conservatives say there are 39 forms of ID that let people prove their name and address when they vote in a federal election, arguing that's enough to get rid of vouching and the use of the voter information cards as proof of address.

But how easy is it to prove you are who you say you are when you cast a ballot?

The experts who so far have appeared before the procedure and House affairs committee have raised concerns about the list provided by Elections Canada, and defended by Pierre Poilievre, minister of state for democratic reform.

The biggest catch seems to be the need for voters to prove where they live. Take away the driver's licence, and it gets complicated.

Here are three things to know about the way Bill C-23 would change how Canadians could identify themselves to cast ballots in federal elections.

1. Few pieces of ID list address

Voters don't just prove their identity to cast a ballot: they have to prove where they live too. And while Elections Canada says 85 per cent of Canadians have a driver's licence — based on the numbers they get from provincial licensing offices — that penetration drops in urban areas like Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal, where better public transit systems mean fewer people require cars to get around. 

One of the democracy experts appearing before the committee Thursday made that point. Student Vote's Taylor Gunn, who lives in Toronto, told the committee that he doesn't have a driver's licence.

"My health card, embarrassingly enough, is my only piece of official ID and it doesn't have my address on it. My wife couldn't vouch for me right now [under Bill C-23]," Gunn said.

Government issued ID like passports, social insurance number cards and birth certificates do not show an address.

2. Originals required

No driver's licence? No problem. Poilievre told MPs in question period Friday that photo ID and government-issued ID aren't required. His critics, however, say it's not that easy.

The list of accepted identification includes "things like utility bills, [Old Age Security] or Employment Insurance cheques, statement of attestation from aboriginal reserve, Indian status card, a student card, the list goes on and on. It's 39 different options. We just think it's reasonable that people bring some form of ID when they show up to vote," Poilievre said.

The list also includes bank statements and insurance policies. Unless, that is, the documents are delivered by email. A printed version of emailed documents won't suffice. Instead, voters would have to go to the bank or the hydro or insurance company — or dig through their paper files at home — to find an original copy. And they'll have to know that before they head to the polling station to cast a ballot on the advance polling day or election day.

3. Other options

For those who don't have a driver's licence, they could present a lease or have a letter of attestation from a shelter, soup kitchen, student or senior residence, or long-term care facility. But that requires more planning than simply heading to the polling station on election day.

Neufeld, the former chief electoral officer in British Columbia and now a consultant, says if the government is worried about vouching, there are ways to make it more secure.

There are problems, he says, including rushed poll clerks not keeping detailed records of who is vouching, or for whom they are vouching.

He said he likes a method used in Manitoba elections.

"If they have two pieces of ID but neither of them definitively proves their residential address, then they have to sign a declaration that the address they're claiming to live at is indeed their address," Neufeld said Thursday after speaking to MPs.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

The Russia options for a weakened NATO: Brian Stewart

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 28 Maret 2014 | 21.17

We've now heard from the supreme commander of NATO in Europe, Gen. Philip Breedlove, that the 150,000 Russian combat troops on Ukraine's eastern border are "very, very sizable and very, very ready."

NATO on the other hand is "unwilling, unable and unready," at least if you go by some of its vocal military critics in recent years.

Breedlove would contest that description, and NATO remains, after all, the largest and most successful military alliance in history. The problem with history, however, is that the 28-nation alliance has seen better and certainly more coherent days.

From a military standpoint, the Ukraine crisis hits Europe at a time when its European members have slashed $45 billion from their militaries in recent years (the equivalent of the entire German defence budget).

Those cuts have left the U.S. to carry 75 per cent of the NATO burden, and they are coming at a time when Washington has been showing much less interest in European security, as it "pivots" its military strategy to the Pacific.

By contrast, Russian military spending has surged 92 per cent in just four years and will rise by 18 per cent this year, according to the authoritative Janes Defence Weekly military publications and Russian state figures.

Clearly, NATO did not expect to see this echo of the Cold War erupt, and defence analysts are wondering just how fit and flexible the alliance will be if tensions escalate further — not just along Ukraine's borders, but in other areas where NATO members abut Russia.

The immediate need is to ensure those same very ready Russian forces don't move into eastern and southern Ukraine, as they did in Crimea, to "protect" Russian speaking minorities, as Vladimir Putin would have it.

This would be a catastrophe for both Ukraine and the stability of Europe.

Stay out of Ukraine

At this point, it's clear that diplomats might have a few more tools than the generals to try and shore up Ukraine's independence.

These would include further economic sanctions against Putin's regime, more diplomatic isolation of Moscow, and urgent economic and technical assistance for Kyiv as it tries to build a democratic state free of the suffocating corruption that has crippled it almost since it became independent in 1991.

Another wrinkle here is that Europe has grown critically reliant on Russian energy supplies. And clearly a formula must be found to reduce Ukraine's and probably central Europe's dependence on Russian energy.

UKRAINE-CRISIS/DISMISSAL

Ukraine's new acting Defence Minister Mykhailo Koval, the former head of the Ukrainian border guard. His predecessor, Ihor Tenyukh, was let go over his handling of Crimea's annexation. (Reuters)

Militarily, however, the kind of help that has been discussed for Ukraine's poor-cousin armed forces is strikingly limited.

It would include some technical support, satellite intelligence and communications upgrades to counter any cyberwar. Plus real uniforms and "military meals."

Ukraine, of course, is not a member of NATO, and too much involvement by the alliance at this point would almost certainly heighten tensions dramatically.

Offering to shore up Ukraine's military, NATO believes, would be a step much too far in a country for which Russia has deep emotional ties and considers part of its, though now much reduced, sphere of influence.

Concern about provoking Russia unnecessarily was why so many in NATO were always cool to Ukrainian membership whenever it was brought up.

One of the strongest opponents of Ukrainian membership in NATO was the former Cold War-era diplomat /strategist Henry Kissinger, who continues to warn that such a move would topple Europe's delicate balance of powers.

"Far too often the Ukrainian issue is posed as a showdown: whether Ukraine joins the East or the West," he wrote last week in the Washington Post.

"But if the Ukraine is to survive and thrive, it must not be either side's outpost against the other — it should function as a bridge between the two."

One for all?

Even leaving Ukraine aside, NATO has other potential crises on its flanks, where it is obliged by treaty to protect increasingly nervous NATO members who are also neighbours of Russia.

These include the three former Soviet Union satellites, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, all with fragile economies and significant Russian minorities; as well as the much larger Poland, a former member of the Soviet Union's Warsaw Pact military alliance.

Including Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania was always controversial within NATO because they are so far east and so difficult to defend.

Still, they made it in and now demand NATO show it would be ready to honour its famous (Article 5) guarantee that an attack on one member involves an attack on all.

In recent weeks, the U.S., with U.K. support to come, has rushed in limited fighter plane and other  air support for the Baltic members, as well as 300 support staff and some naval units.

UKRAINE-CRISIS/

Russian sailors mill about onboard the Suzdalets at the Crimean port of Sevastopol earlier this week. As many as 150,000 Russian troops are also taking part in exercises along Ukraine's eastern boundary. (Reuters)

But so cautious a response has not eased the nervousness in the region, which has been warning NATO for years about Russian ambitions.  

Some of their fears stem from the large military exercises Moscow has run in the Baltic region in recent years, including some that simulate attacks on Lithuania and Poland.

NATO, it should be noted, also exercises units in the Baltic region, while Poland has recently launched a substantial arms buildup of its own in response to Russia's.

These days, NATO is also hearing rising security concerns and demands for reassurance from nations such as Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria , as well as both the Czech and Slovak Republics.

Here, NATO's worries are not limited to military pressure-tactics, but encompass the deep political crises and anti-democratic trends in some of these Eastern Europe countries, where crony-capitalism and the leverage of Russian gas supplies open new doors to Putin's influence.

No, this is not the old Cold War. Today's Russia is weaker than the West, even with few European powers ready for yet another arms race with Moscow.

But if Putin's regime really does feel that NATO's once triumphant march to the east is at least in part reversible, given the right pressure points, then NATO's very credibility is about to be severely tested, yet again.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

At Issue panel: The controversy over Canada's election reform bill

The debate over Bill C-23,  the federal government's proposed election reform bill, heated up today in Ottawa.

The author of the report, who is often cited by the Conservatives to support their proposed changes, seems to be at odds with the act.

"It is my opinion that [Pierre Poilievre] has not interpreted my report correctly," Harry Neufeld said.

But Poilievre, minister of state for democratic reform, argued he uses Neufeld's arguments appropriately and in context.

The National's At Issue panel discussed the growing debate surrounding Bill C-23.

"This bill is in a lot of trouble, or by any conventional standard would be," said Andrew Coyne.

All expert recommendations have not been absorbed by the Conservative government and the government is choosing to go in a different direction each time, he said.

Chantal Hébert compared the debate to the controversy over the long-form census. However, this time the issue is more serious, she said.

"It's more serious when every election expert tells you that you're actually going to hurt the voting and the democratic system in the country," she said.

Despite the negative reaction from some, Bruce Anderson said there are some good elements to the bill.

Watch the discussion by clicking on the video at the top of this story.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More

Maine city moves to block Alberta oilsands crude from reaching its port

South Portland, Maine, could be the first U.S. city to pass a law to block Alberta oilsands crude from getting anywhere near its waterfront.

The city of 25,000 people is turning into a test case for local communities that don't want oilsands bitumen shipped from their ports.

Tom Blake, the former mayor of South Portland, gave CBC News a tour of his city this week where a temporary moratorium has been imposed on any new structures used by oil companies to help load oil from a pipeline on land, to oil tankers in their port for export.

"We have no interest in having the world's dirtiest oil come through our community," said Blake, who currently sits on city council.

South Portland sits across the bay from Portland, Maine. It's the third-largest oil port on the U.S. East Coast.

It has provided imported oil by pipeline to Canada since 1941, when it was built to help provide a safe source of energy to this country during the Second World War.

The oil moves north from Maine through New Hampshire to Montreal via the Portland Montreal Pipeline, a subsidiary of the Canadian parent company that is owned by three companies involved in the Alberta oilsands: Shell, Suncor and Imperial Oil.

In 2008, the company applied for a permit to reverse the flow of the pipeline to bring Canadian oil to the U.S. east coast.

The plan was scrapped because of the recession and there is no current project on the books. But the company president Larry Wilson has been quoted as saying he is looking for every opportunity to revive the plan.

"The current president has stated publicly many times and to me personally that he would love to bring tarsands to South Portland," said Blake.

So when Canada's National Energy Board approved the reversal of Enbridge's Line 9B to bring oilsands bitumen east to Montreal in early March, many in South Portland figured it was only a matter of time before that oil would be heading south to their port for export.

"They want to use the existing infrastructure because they're not getting their other pipes done as quickly as they want to," said Crystal Gooderich, a spokeswoman for local citizen's group Protect South Portland.

Last fall the group of residents formed a vocal anti-oilsands campaign and narrowly lost a citywide vote on a restrictive new ordinance on all waterfront development.

But it was enough to convince the city to pass a six-month moratorium in November on proposals to build new structures to transfer oil onto marine vessels.

Portland Pipeline's original plan included two 21-metre industrial stacks on the city's scenic waterfront to burn off gas from the piped oil before its transfer to a tanker.

The council may extend the moratorium for a further six months to allow a committee to draft an ordinance for a permanent ban.

Health and safety concerns

For Gooderich and her neighbours, it's a health and safety issue. Local neighbourhoods are dotted with more than 120 oil storage tanks that have sprouted up since the 1940s.

And the current Portland Pipeline runs right through backyards and streets lined with trendy Cape Cod style homes.

People worry about air pollution and heavy oil spilling in their scenic bay.

South Portland, Maine Jamie Py

Jamie Py, the executive director of the Maine Energy Marketers Association, sees no reason to block Alberta's oilsands crude from reaching South Portland's waterfront. (CBC News)

"The tarsands product is so difficult to clean up, almost impossible," said Gooderich.

"If we were to have a disaster in Casco Bay, or in our drinking supply in Lake Sebago, it would be something we'd never recover from fully."

The moratorium and the possibility of a precedent-setting local law have sparked a sharp response from the oil industry, which is running a series of pro-oilsands ads in local papers.

The American Petroleum Institute, which represents more than 500 oil and gas companies, called the current moratorium "ill-advised, unnecessary and unsupported."

In a letter to the city in December 2013, it warned "the proposed moratorium could cause harm to local, state and national interests." 

"The development of oilsands promotes North American energy security and brings substantial economic benefits to the state of Maine." writes API, which predicts this will all end up in court.

Moratorium bad for business

Local businesses say a vocal minority have lost sight of how important the oil industry is the region's economy.

"It's been an oil port for a long time, said Jamie Py, the executive director of the Maine Energy Marketers Association. "Eighty per cent of the shipping business that comes into the port is related to the oil business."

"It's not unprecedented that people want to ban things, that happens all the time. On this one all I can say is look at the facts, ladies and gentlemen, let's look at the facts of what this product is. And I think the facts will show you it's not any more dangerous or any more difficult to handle than traditional crude oil, so why do we have this big issue here?"

Proposed oil projects in California

(b/d = barrel a day)

San Francisco Bay area:

  • Valero, Benicia: 70,000 b/d refinery-linked crude-by-rail terminal.
  • WesPac, Pittsburg: 242,000 b/d oil terminal, including rail, ship, tank farm and pipeline.

Southern California

  • Valero, Wilmington: 60,000 b/d refinery-linked crude-by-rail terminal .

San Joaquin Valley

  • Alon, Bakersfield: 150,000 b/d refinery and pipeline-linked crude-by-rail terminal.
  • Plains All American, Bakersfield: 65,000 b/d pipeline-linked crude-by-rail terminal.

Central Coast

  • Phillips 66, Santa Maria: Up to 52,000 b/d refinery-linked crude-by-rail terminal.

- Details provided by Natural Resources Defence Council 

South Portland is being closely watched by people on the U.S. West Coast. Local environmental groups in six California communities are also trying to use local laws to prevent oilsands and Bakken crude from coming to their ports by train.

"We don't want to be the pass-through sacrifice zone for crude oil transiting through California and being exported," said Diane Bailey, senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defence Council in an interview from San Francisco. 

"Right now there is a domestic crude oil export ban, but that's not to say that the Canadian tarsands can't come through California coast ports to be exported, and we've very concerned  that it would be all risk and very little benefit to these communities."

Py thinks that national environmental groups waging a war on the oilsands industry as a whole are using local groups to help fight the battle.

"Canadian people have made a decision that this is an OK thing to do, that this is in their best interest to do so. It's an energy source that's huge and we would like to do business with the United States, but there are some folks in the United States who said no, we don't want to do business with Canada. That's a cultural problem, It's an economic and it's a political problem."

In the meantime, a special committee in South Portland is carefully drafting an ordinance to stop oilsands crude from getting anywhere near an export tanker in the city's bay. There's no doubt this local law would have to stand up to intense international scrutiny. 

It's expected to be ready sometime in the fall.


21.17 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger